Comment 390 for bug 620074

Revision history for this message
In , perlover (perlover-linux-kernel-bugs) wrote :

And i saw the patch from post #366, i didn't understand why the author tell that this is "proper backport". There no code with 'prev_cfqq' variable. I think that patch from #366 may be not valid patch.

Please try this patch. This patch for 2.6.29 and more kernels as i think
I didn't test it because i don't have a test machine for experiments. I have only Linux server under a heavy load...