(In reply to comment #450) Maybe this is related to the observations at phoronox's kernel tracker[1]. An in depth article was also posted[2].
1: http://www.phoromatic.com/kernel-tracker.php?sys_1=yes&sys_3=yes&sys_4=yes&sub_type_System=yes&sub_type_Processor=yes&sub_type_Disk=yes&sub_type_Graphics=yes&sub_type_Memory=yes&sub_type_Network=yes&date_range=15®ression_threshold=0.15&only_show_regressions=yes&submit=Update+Results 2: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_2635_fail&num=1
Note: Link 1 is valid for the next few days, thereafter you have to raise the displayed days to get the regression back into view
(In reply to comment #450)
Maybe this is related to the observations at phoronox's kernel tracker[1]. An in depth article was also posted[2].
1: http:// www.phoromatic. com/kernel- tracker. php?sys_ 1=yes&sys_ 3=yes&sys_ 4=yes&sub_ type_System= yes&sub_ type_Processor= yes&sub_ type_Disk= yes&sub_ type_Graphics= yes&sub_ type_Memory= yes&sub_ type_Network= yes&date_ range=15& regression_ threshold= 0.15&only_ show_regression s=yes&submit= Update+ Results www.phoronix. com/scan. php?page= article& item=linux_ 2635_fail& num=1
2: http://
Note: Link 1 is valid for the next few days, thereafter you have to raise the displayed days to get the regression back into view