Created an attachment (id=34270)
BUG in i915_gem.c - obj_priv->pages_refcount is zero in i915_gem_object_put_pages()
> Thanks for testing. Unfortunately the patch you tested is outdated and
> known not to work. At least the failure rates you're getting on your
> Pentium M 1.5 GHz are about the same as on my Pentium M 1.2 GHz. Can you
> please retest with my latest patch (attached to this bug)?
It seems to be very much a matter of mood, on friday evening I saw no single bad message while today there were a lot.
Since a crash I'm running now with 2.6.34-rc2 + your patch and one of mine for sd.
Both with previous patch and current one I'm hitting a BUG() in i915_gem_object_put_pages(). obj_priv->pages_refcount is zero in there. No idea if it's related or not but it kills i915 driver!
Attached is kernel log of system including BUG(), but no bad chipset flush.
Created an attachment (id=34270) >pages_ refcount is zero in i915_gem_ object_ put_pages( )
BUG in i915_gem.c - obj_priv-
> Thanks for testing. Unfortunately the patch you tested is outdated and
> known not to work. At least the failure rates you're getting on your
> Pentium M 1.5 GHz are about the same as on my Pentium M 1.2 GHz. Can you
> please retest with my latest patch (attached to this bug)?
It seems to be very much a matter of mood, on friday evening I saw no single bad message while today there were a lot.
Since a crash I'm running now with 2.6.34-rc2 + your patch and one of mine for sd. object_ put_pages( ). obj_priv- >pages_ refcount is zero in there. No idea if it's related or not but it kills i915 driver!
Both with previous patch and current one I'm hitting a BUG() in i915_gem_
Attached is kernel log of system including BUG(), but no bad chipset flush.