On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 18:55 +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> @Robert -- presumablly you discovered this when something failed. I'd
> like to understand what we are depending on here to try and get the
> version # close to right.
Actually, I think this bug was a dud: I misdiagnosed the '[: '... errors
as being the cause of my problem.
The actual issue was lvm2 userspace not supporting the sysfs layout, for
which I have since filed another bug.
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 18:55 +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> @Robert -- presumablly you discovered this when something failed. I'd
> like to understand what we are depending on here to try and get the
> version # close to right.
Actually, I think this bug was a dud: I misdiagnosed the '[: '... errors
as being the cause of my problem.
The actual issue was lvm2 userspace not supporting the sysfs layout, for
which I have since filed another bug.
Sorry for the noise !
status invalid