On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 16:40 +0000, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > > Then I don't understand why you reopened the bug here.
Because it had expired and had not been marked as fixed.
> For the record, I > haven't been able to reproduce this problem on lucid..
Great news, thanks for the info ! I am looking forward to be able to test this myself in squeeze...
I'm going to close this bug again...
-- Laurent Bonnaud. http://www.lis.inpg.fr/pages_perso/bonnaud/
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 16:40 +0000, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
>
> Then I don't understand why you reopened the bug here.
Because it had expired and had not been marked as fixed.
> For the record, I
> haven't been able to reproduce this problem on lucid..
Great news, thanks for the info ! I am looking forward to be able to
test this myself in squeeze...
I'm going to close this bug again...
-- www.lis. inpg.fr/ pages_perso/ bonnaud/
Laurent Bonnaud.
http://