Comment 6 for bug 402890

Revision history for this message
Stefan Bader (smb) wrote :

Ok Steve, it seems your suspicions were after all justified. I just tried to load both modules with the current code and realized that the driver name, which is defined by one string internally, has to be changed, too. I queue up a follow-up patch (which I tested by loading both modules, but without the actual hardware), which rename that driver name as well. The -15.50 upload got rejected for some other problem, so the everything gets into the next upload.