On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Tyler Hicks <email address hidden> wrote:
> I'm not convinced that the lower filename
> "ECRYPTFS_FNEK_ENCRYPTED." prefix is all that necessary.
Tyler-
I tend to agree... I feel like this is too verbose. Something
shorter/simpler should suffice, if anything at all.
I like your idea about using the header. What's the limitation on
length in that header? What about performance?
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Tyler Hicks <email address hidden> wrote: FNEK_ENCRYPTED. " prefix is all that necessary.
> I'm not convinced that the lower filename
> "ECRYPTFS_
Tyler-
I tend to agree... I feel like this is too verbose. Something
shorter/simpler should suffice, if anything at all.
I like your idea about using the header. What's the limitation on
length in that header? What about performance?
:-Dustin