(In reply to comment #105)
> The last patch I attached here is a kernel patch; it should make things better
> for you if you've got a KMS enabled configuration. Is there any way for you to
> try that, Scott?
>
Tried with the kernel source from the Arch repos and got:
patching file drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1618.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h.rej
patching file drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1623.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 1822.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 1869.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 2022.
4 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c.rej
I did make sure this patch was applied before the standard arch patches. Can you send the link for the other kernel source you had me use last time?
(In reply to comment #105)
> The last patch I attached here is a kernel patch; it should make things better
> for you if you've got a KMS enabled configuration. Is there any way for you to
> try that, Scott?
>
Tried with the kernel source from the Arch repos and got:
patching file drivers/ gpu/drm/ i915/i915_ reg.h gpu/drm/ i915/i915_ reg.h.rej gpu/drm/ i915/intel_ display. c gpu/drm/ i915/intel_ display. c.rej
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1618.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/
patching file drivers/
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1623.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 1822.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 1869.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 2022.
4 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/
I did make sure this patch was applied before the standard arch patches. Can you send the link for the other kernel source you had me use last time?
Thanks!
Scott