On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 03:30 +0000, barakaspeed wrote:
> I installed the updates and seemed to still have the high cpu usage in
> 686 (after disabling the fix above) I reinstated the fix and I'm back
> down to 4-5% usage. I don't think the kernel updates helped much for
> me. I vaguely remember that the email stated it was more of a security
> update for the kernel.
It was about 50/50 fixes+security.
The main thing was dropping the HZ from 1000 to 250, which should have
fixed the problem.
If it didn't for you, then we're looking at a different issue.
On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 03:30 +0000, barakaspeed wrote:
> I installed the updates and seemed to still have the high cpu usage in
> 686 (after disabling the fix above) I reinstated the fix and I'm back
> down to 4-5% usage. I don't think the kernel updates helped much for
> me. I vaguely remember that the email stated it was more of a security
> update for the kernel.
It was about 50/50 fixes+security.
The main thing was dropping the HZ from 1000 to 250, which should have
fixed the problem.
If it didn't for you, then we're looking at a different issue.