On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Axx83 <email address hidden> wrote:
> what kind of non disclosure agreement could there be on an open source
> implementation of a probably patented technology ??? If it's open source
> and if the hardware is patented of course.
>
> Really I don't understand the issue, if someone needs a legal analysis
> of this issue I could work on it with some help. But from a brief look
> it seems illogical.
It doesn't seem like all the facts are out in the open. GregKH claims
he /knows/ the information was obtained illegally [1], which Shem
disputes [2].
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Axx83 <email address hidden> wrote:
> what kind of non disclosure agreement could there be on an open source
> implementation of a probably patented technology ??? If it's open source
> and if the hardware is patented of course.
>
> Really I don't understand the issue, if someone needs a legal analysis
> of this issue I could work on it with some help. But from a brief look
> it seems illogical.
It doesn't seem like all the facts are out in the open. GregKH claims
he /knows/ the information was obtained illegally [1], which Shem
disputes [2].
[1] http:// lkml.org/ lkml/2008/ 10/7/403 lkml.org/ lkml/2008/ 10/7/428
[2] http://