Thanks for the update Andre and taking the time to recompile the kernel.
- Amit/Luka Can you bump the heading to include the Atom 230 (x86_64)...
It's been awhile, (playing with mainline 2.6.28-rc's for gem/kms/etc..), but Linus's original 2.6.27 release did not show this problem. (I never tested 2.6.27.1+) and that's where is started the git bisect from.
Anyone know the best way to bring this up directly to the kernel-dev?
I'd like to send a message like:
- Kernel-dev's
Commit 67d9b90 enables a patch that prevents the flash corruption in specific intel lan 1Gb adapters. From what we found in Bug 279186 it also prevents both the Atom 230/330 to boot (x86_64), now that it's been fixed in mainline 2.6.27.1+ and ubuntu's, sync'd to 2.6.27.4 (8.17) can it be fully reverted?
Thanks for the update Andre and taking the time to recompile the kernel.
- Amit/Luka Can you bump the heading to include the Atom 230 (x86_64)...
It's been awhile, (playing with mainline 2.6.28-rc's for gem/kms/etc..), but Linus's original 2.6.27 release did not show this problem. (I never tested 2.6.27.1+) and that's where is started the git bisect from.
Anyone know the best way to bring this up directly to the kernel-dev?
I'd like to send a message like:
- Kernel-dev's
Commit 67d9b90 enables a patch that prevents the flash corruption in specific intel lan 1Gb adapters. From what we found in Bug 279186 it also prevents both the Atom 230/330 to boot (x86_64), now that it's been fixed in mainline 2.6.27.1+ and ubuntu's, sync'd to 2.6.27.4 (8.17) can it be fully reverted?
Regards,
Robert