But, if Canonical adds the possibility of encrypted home, then they also introduce this problem.
I wouldn't call it a bug, as it works as intended, but anyway.
Canonical also chose to implement plymouth in 10.04 (Debian put it back to testing) and solved most of it's problems, so why not for this one?
Can I get any official statement from Canonical here?
@Dekar
I understand.
But, if Canonical adds the possibility of encrypted home, then they also introduce this problem.
I wouldn't call it a bug, as it works as intended, but anyway.
Canonical also chose to implement plymouth in 10.04 (Debian put it back to testing) and solved most of it's problems, so why not for this one?
Can I get any official statement from Canonical here?