Ah OK, I was confused because you referred to the "sed -i '255s/strtoll/strtoul/'" in my post (which as you say is not really necessary) when I think you were talking about the "sed -i '201s/strtoll/strtoul/'" which modified the 32-bit version of the call. I now understand, thanks!
Ah OK, I was confused because you referred to the "sed -i '255s/strtoll/ strtoul/ '" in my post (which as you say is not really necessary) when I think you were talking about the "sed -i '201s/strtoll/ strtoul/ '" which modified the 32-bit version of the call. I now understand, thanks!