Ubuntu
linux package

  1. Bug #201680
  2. Comment #8

Comment 8 for bug 201680

Revision history for this message
KarlGoetz (kgoetz) wrote : Re: [Bug 201680] Re: 2.6.24 contains non-free fore200e files
  • unnamed Edit (189 bytes, application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc)

On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 02:45 +0000, Brian Kemp wrote:
> We know it's not the preferred form for editing the work. It's too bad
> that the copyright holder seems to think so.
>

if its not the prefered form its not free - especially since we are told
there *is* source code that we are not being given access too.
kk

> On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 6:28 PM, KarlGoetz <email address hidden> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 14:18 +0000, Tim Gardner wrote:
> > > I agree with David Miller: http://lkml.org/lkml/2000/2/23/219
> >
> > Not sure what your agreeing with -
> > That sourceless microcode is ok if its GPL?
> >
> > >
> > > ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
> > > Status: Triaged => Invalid
> > >
> >