We know it's not the preferred form for editing the work. It's too bad
that the copyright holder seems to think so.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 6:28 PM, KarlGoetz <email address hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 14:18 +0000, Tim Gardner wrote:
> > I agree with David Miller: http://lkml.org/lkml/2000/2/23/219
>
> Not sure what your agreeing with -
> That sourceless microcode is ok if its GPL?
>
> >
> > ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
> > Status: Triaged => Invalid
> >
>
>
> ** Attachment added: "unnamed"
> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13186404/unnamed
>
> --
> 2.6.24 contains non-free fore200e files
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201680
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of
> gNewSense, which is a direct subscriber.
>
We know it's not the preferred form for editing the work. It's too bad
that the copyright holder seems to think so.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 6:28 PM, KarlGoetz <email address hidden> wrote: lkml.org/ lkml/2000/ 2/23/219 launchpadlibrar ian.net/ 13186404/ unnamed /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 201680
> On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 14:18 +0000, Tim Gardner wrote:
> > I agree with David Miller: http://
>
> Not sure what your agreeing with -
> That sourceless microcode is ok if its GPL?
>
> >
> > ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
> > Status: Triaged => Invalid
> >
>
>
> ** Attachment added: "unnamed"
> http://
>
> --
> 2.6.24 contains non-free fore200e files
> https:/
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of
> gNewSense, which is a direct subscriber.
>