Comment 35 for bug 1917813
Revision history for this message
|
|
#35 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
a60fb26
(Get the code!)
(In reply to Doug Smythies from comment #30)
> (In reply to Srinivas Pandruvada from comment #29)
> > I tried to reproduce with your scripts on CFL-S systems and didn't observe
> > the same almost 1/2 half year back. Systems can be configured different way
> > which impacts HWP algorithm. So it is possible that my lab system is
> > configured differently.
>
> By "CFL-S" I assume you mean "Coffee Lake".
Yes, desktop part.
>
> I wish you had reported back to me your findings, as we could have figured
> out the difference.
>
I thought I have responded you, I have to search my emails. I had to specially get a system arranged but it had 200MHz higher turbo. You did share your scripts at that time.
These algorithm are tuned on a system, so small variations can have bigger impact.
Let's see if ChenYu, has some system same as yours.
> Anyway, try the automated quick test I posted in comment 20. Keep in mind
> that it needs to be HWP enabled, active, powersave, default epp=128. It is
> on purpose that the tool does not check for this configuration.