Comment 22 for bug 1896008
Revision history for this message
| Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo (cascardo) wrote | #22 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
35a32c5
(Get the code!)
So, the test is running with the newer definition as it is picked up from linux-libc-dev. But the kernel (linux-oem-5.6, in this case) doesn't know about it. So it fails.
However, any binaries out there would be using the old definition, which the linux-oem-5.6 should accept just fine. I guess we will be stuck with this double definition forever as "we don't break userspace ABI *ever*" *coff*.
IMHO, it's just fine leaving this for next cycle. But pick it up, cause we will start seeing binaries out there using the new definition.
Cascardo.