On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 05:37:46AM -0000, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
>Coiby, can you please work on a DMI based workaround in gpiolib-acpi.c?
>It'll have higher chance to get merged.
>
Thank you for the suggestion! Linus Walleij also suggested introducing
a new quirk [1]. Although my main effort is on patching pinctrl-amd.c
without affecting other touchpad together with Hans de Goede [1], I
have spent some time on understanding gpiolib-acpi.c. For now my
conclusion is there is no way to bypass pinctrl-amd by introducing
a new quirk.
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 05:37:46AM -0000, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
>Coiby, can you please work on a DMI based workaround in gpiolib-acpi.c?
>It'll have higher chance to get merged.
>
Thank you for the suggestion! Linus Walleij also suggested introducing
a new quirk [1]. Although my main effort is on patching pinctrl-amd.c
without affecting other touchpad together with Hans de Goede [1], I
have spent some time on understanding gpiolib-acpi.c. For now my
conclusion is there is no way to bypass pinctrl-amd by introducing
a new quirk.
[1] https:/ /www.spinics. net/lists/ linux-gpio/ msg53641. html /www.spinics. net/lists/ linux-gpio/ msg53901. html
[2] https:/