Comment 28 for bug 1867916

Revision history for this message
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo) wrote :

Ryan,

Thanks! That matches the expected output.

There's a bit more that I got curious about,
which is quicker to get with lsblk than in kdump:

$ lsblk --ascii > lp1867916-lsblk 2>&1

cheers,
Mauricio