Comment 8 for bug 1863044

Ah, I was just about to tell you that I have just tried master-next at a59858e18bc8996f8c96d307a33e504b079dc541 ! I think that is the same sha that ended up being tagged as -89, so I think it provides us with the same information.

Sadly -89 also doesn't seem to work; dmesg attached.

I don't know anything about the qla2xxx driver, so I was planning to confirm that the problem was introduced by the set of qla2xxx changes that went into -73 and then bisect them. But, if you have any insight or specific knowledge that would suggest a better path, I'm very happy to give that a go.

Regards,
Daniel