Comment 4 for bug 182603

That's what I was planning next, actually: Make a patch to add aufs to linux-ubuntu-modules. In my tests, it's proven to be much more reliable than unionfs (which is still version 1.4 in hardy).

I'm currently adding support for diskless clients to Mythbuntu and I *need* aufs for that - unionfs just doesn't cut it. Due to the nature of diskless clients, I also need NFS support in aufs. aufs could also easily replace unionfs in the live disks if desired (since I remember how much pain the unionfs breakage during the gutsy cycle caused to us Mythbuntu people I'm sure there's some interest at least).