Comment 37 for bug 1796720

Revision history for this message
In , quirin.blaeser (quirin.blaeser-linux-kernel-bugs) wrote :

(In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #9)
> I don't think this is a bug. The problem is, prior to that patch, the
> display component was requesting minimum clocks that were 10x too low. This
> saved power, but led to display problems on some systems because the clocks
> were too low to sustain the display requirements.

so
 - 93b100ddd... fools DC
 + 93b100ddd... fools PM

from my point of view scaling clock values just happens at the wrong place.
So we may have to find different points in code from where smuX_get_XXX gets called by PM _or_ DC, may be in Firmware.