Comment 678 for bug 1786013

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-meta-bluefield (5.4.0.1047.46) for focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

mali-midgard/unknown (arm64)
lxc/unknown (arm64)
openrazer/unknown (arm64)
nat-rtsp/unknown (arm64)
langford/unknown (arm64)
lime-forensics/unknown (arm64)
gost-crypto/unknown (arm64)
lttng-modules/unknown (arm64)
dm-writeboost/unknown (arm64)
linux-bluefield/unknown (arm64)
west-chamber/unknown (arm64)
dpdk/unknown (arm64)
ddcci-driver-linux/unknown (arm64)
iptables-netflow/unknown (arm64)
openafs/unknown (arm64)
adv-17v35x/unknown (arm64)
zfs-linux/unknown (arm64)
jool/unknown (arm64)
glibc/unknown (arm64)
wireguard-linux-compat/unknown (arm64)
snapd/unknown (arm64)
bbswitch/unknown (arm64)
r8168/unknown (arm64)
acpi-call/unknown (arm64)
fwts/unknown (arm64)
xtables-addons/unknown (arm64)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html#linux-meta-bluefield

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!