>"I figured out the modules thing. It seems older kernels don't have separate debs for the modules. I needed the extra package regardless (if both linux-modules-extra and linux-image-extra were missing I don't think the test is right)."
To clarify, you were able to test 4.15.0-17.18 successfully?
>"I went back further: 4.14.0-16-generic_4.14.0-16.19 - is GOOD, no issue 4.15.0-9-generic 4.15.0-9.10 - is bad I'm confirming my build system which has gotten me a few builds, and I'm starting in on the bisect."
To advise, you are performing a reverse bisect. Hence, you are looking for the next most recent kernel after 4.15.0-9-generic 4.15.0-9.10 where it is working.
Sandy Patterson:
>"I figured out the modules thing. It seems older kernels don't have separate debs for the modules. I needed the extra package regardless (if both linux-modules-extra and linux-image-extra were missing I don't think the test is right)."
To clarify, you were able to test 4.15.0-17.18 successfully?
>"I went back further: 4.14.0- 16-generic_ 4.14.0- 16.19 - is GOOD, no issue 4.15.0-9-generic 4.15.0-9.10 - is bad I'm confirming my build system which has gotten me a few builds, and I'm starting in on the bisect."
To advise, you are performing a reverse bisect. Hence, you are looking for the next most recent kernel after 4.15.0-9-generic 4.15.0-9.10 where it is working.