Hmm,
so it is not even burning CPU for anything neither in the Host (usr ~=qemu, sys ~=kernel) nor in the guest itself (~=guest).
The KVM exits confirm that, it doesn't do a a lot entry/exit is the pass in/out of guest context and the only meaningful exit means it emulates an instruction.
So if it is not hogged on a CPU it is waiting for something. Unfortunately this is too windows and x86-arch specific for me to read, even if you get the info. BTW getting the info what instructions it is spinning on can be done via [1] - this might be helpful for others coming by to help. To bad that I still can't reproduce that locally :-/, but at least I haven't heard of anyone else hitting this yet so it must be sort of special to maybe your guest?
Especially I can't see yet how a host kernel update would trigger this :-/
Sorry, but this is up for the kernel Team to consider the changes that happened between those versions in regard to this issue.
Hmm,
so it is not even burning CPU for anything neither in the Host (usr ~=qemu, sys ~=kernel) nor in the guest itself (~=guest).
The KVM exits confirm that, it doesn't do a a lot entry/exit is the pass in/out of guest context and the only meaningful exit means it emulates an instruction.
So if it is not hogged on a CPU it is waiting for something. Unfortunately this is too windows and x86-arch specific for me to read, even if you get the info. BTW getting the info what instructions it is spinning on can be done via [1] - this might be helpful for others coming by to help. To bad that I still can't reproduce that locally :-/, but at least I haven't heard of anyone else hitting this yet so it must be sort of special to maybe your guest?
Especially I can't see yet how a host kernel update would trigger this :-/
Sorry, but this is up for the kernel Team to consider the changes that happened between those versions in regard to this issue.
[1]: https:/ /lkml.org/ lkml/2012/ 6/27/241