Comment 97 for bug 1753662

Hi Joseph,

We're continuing the investigation into this issue, and I was wondering
if you and Nabuto could provide what the last point you had reached was,
and/or next step you were going to do.

From what I can summarize (please confirm/correct):

* Artful (4.13.*) kernels (with any Artful config) is good
* Artful (4.13.*) kernels (with any Xenial config) is also bad

* 4.12-rc4 - relatively good (1.x%) but still not 0% (<5%)
* 4.12-rc3 - also bad (~ 27%)

* Xenial (4.4.*) kernels (with any Xenial config) is bad
* Xenial (4.4.*) kernels (with any Artful config) is still bad

[data point: 4.12-rc4 with Artful configs is good. 4.12-rc4 with Xenial configs is bad.]

So a kernel change + config change results in masked/fixed behavior, I guess?

Is the remaining bisect window basically 4.12-rc4 -> 4.13 ?