On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Paolo Pisati <email address hidden> wrote:
> I see 5 failures marked as blocker there: 4 couldn't complete due to the
> test environment, and 1[*], apparently, is a CONFIG issue (so something
> that predates this patchset).
Sorry - I didn't have time to analyze it last night when I posted. All
5 are expected:
- disk/disk_stress_ng_sda is a test bug (LP: #1751167)
- ethernet/multi_iperf3_* requires a client/server setup we don't
have in place
- miscellanea/bmc_info - this system doesn't have a conventional BMC
- miscellanea/efi_boot_mode - this system boots w/ u-boot
- miscellanea/ipmi_test - this system doesn't have a conventional BMC
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Paolo Pisati <email address hidden> wrote:
> I see 5 failures marked as blocker there: 4 couldn't complete due to the
> test environment, and 1[*], apparently, is a CONFIG issue (so something
> that predates this patchset).
Sorry - I didn't have time to analyze it last night when I posted. All stress_ ng_sda is a test bug (LP: #1751167) multi_iperf3_ * requires a client/server setup we don't bmc_info - this system doesn't have a conventional BMC efi_boot_ mode - this system boots w/ u-boot ipmi_test - this system doesn't have a conventional BMC
5 are expected:
- disk/disk_
- ethernet/
have in place
- miscellanea/
- miscellanea/
- miscellanea/