Comment 40 for bug 1723619

Revision history for this message
In , Ilia Mirkin (imirkin) wrote :

Just something I noticed... does this help? (Obviously without a revert applied.)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/i2c/gm200.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/i2c/gm200.c
index a23c5f315221..ff94c6cb9a29 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/i2c/gm200.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/i2c/gm200.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@

 static const struct nvkm_i2c_func
 gm200_i2c = {
- .pad_x_new = gf119_i2c_pad_x_new,
+ .pad_x_new = gm200_i2c_pad_x_new,
        .pad_s_new = gm200_i2c_pad_s_new,
        .aux = 8,
        .aux_stat = gk104_aux_stat,