While preparing to provide a test kernel I noticed that the backport for patch #1 introduces a test for MACHINE_HAS_TLB_LC which is not present even in linux-next. Martin, is this really correct?
+ /* Reset TLB flush mask */ + if (MACHINE_HAS_TLB_LC) + cpumask_copy(mm_cpumask(mm), &mm->context.cpu_attach_mask);
While preparing to provide a test kernel I noticed that the backport for patch #1 introduces a test for MACHINE_HAS_TLB_LC which is not present even in linux-next. Martin, is this really correct?
+ /* Reset TLB flush mask */ HAS_TLB_ LC) copy(mm_ cpumask( mm), &mm->context. cpu_attach_ mask);
+ if (MACHINE_
+ cpumask_