------- Comment From <email address hidden> 2017-09-07 19:41 EDT-------
(In reply to comment #25)
> Does IBM have any feedback for us regarding the test kernel Andy provided?
>
We're planning to test this month. We'll give feedback as soon as the test is completed. The tentative target will be Sept. 29 or sooner.
> Can you please clarify if this means you are expecting the db entry to be
> delivered as an x509 certificate issued by the CA key listed in KEK, or if
> it should be delivered according to the format defined in the UEFI spec for
> authenticated variable updates?
Our team needs to have some discussions before finalizing the expected format. We'll get back to you soon. Thanks!
------- Comment From <email address hidden> 2017-09-07 19:41 EDT-------
(In reply to comment #25)
> Does IBM have any feedback for us regarding the test kernel Andy provided?
>
We're planning to test this month. We'll give feedback as soon as the test is completed. The tentative target will be Sept. 29 or sooner.
> Can you please clarify if this means you are expecting the db entry to be
> delivered as an x509 certificate issued by the CA key listed in KEK, or if
> it should be delivered according to the format defined in the UEFI spec for
> authenticated variable updates?
Our team needs to have some discussions before finalizing the expected format. We'll get back to you soon. Thanks!