Comment 53 for bug 1670041

Revision history for this message
Dmitrii Shcherbakov (dmitriis) wrote :

Eric,

I should have tried cubic in the previous (#46) test - quite an interesting result: http://paste.ubuntu.com/25200234/ (6 tests cubic & bbr)

lspci | grep QCA
3b:00.0 Network controller: Qualcomm Atheros QCA6174 802.11ac Wireless Network Adapter (rev 32)

With cubic cwnd grows quite quickly and reaches 608 KBytes in the best case while with bbr it converges to 8.48 KBytes regardless of the constants used.

I will build a 4.13rc2 kernel without any modifications and perform the same test to compare.