The bare metal system is a backup server (2x3 Terabytes of disk space), holding a lot of subvolumes from incremental backups).
The report files I just sent are from the bare metal system. Note that btrfs is on top of a Luks encrypted partition which is on top of a md raid. That setup is a lot different from the cloud server which had a btrfs partition, directly used in the kvm image (whereas I don't know how the hoster stores that image).
Tu sum up: Both systems are really different in terms of age, hardware, storage, etc.
The only thing both systems have in common is that they use btrfs and ubuntu 16.04.
So far, I did not notice any problems with both systems (no data loss, etc.).
The bare metal system is a backup server (2x3 Terabytes of disk space), holding a lot of subvolumes from incremental backups).
The report files I just sent are from the bare metal system. Note that btrfs is on top of a Luks encrypted partition which is on top of a md raid. That setup is a lot different from the cloud server which had a btrfs partition, directly used in the kvm image (whereas I don't know how the hoster stores that image).
Tu sum up: Both systems are really different in terms of age, hardware, storage, etc.
The only thing both systems have in common is that they use btrfs and ubuntu 16.04.
So far, I did not notice any problems with both systems (no data loss, etc.).