Comment 16 for bug 1648561

Revision history for this message
Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre (cyphermox) wrote :

Right, that's what I expected, but it's good to be sure.

The bug is assigned to the kernel team, they will want to look into it.

To further define the case, are these devices claimed by multipath or by mdadm? What does 'sudo multipath -ll' show? Multipath or mdadm (or other low-level storage services like LVM) may still claim the disk even if it's not partitioned; those should be eliminated as well as cause for the issue.