I also tested the protocol found here[1], on top of mainline kernel v4.9
* Without the nf-next patches :
# time (./list-addrs 3000 | xargs -n1 iptables -A FORWARD -j ACCEPT -s)
real 0m32.994s user 0m1.288s sys 0m26.076s
* With the nf-next patches :
real 0m5.428s user 0m0.068s sys 0m0.288s
I do notice a significant performance increase.
[1] - https://gist.github.com/williammartin/b75e3faf5964648299e4d985413e6c0c
- Eric
I also tested the protocol found here[1], on top of mainline kernel v4.9
* Without the nf-next patches :
# time (./list-addrs 3000 | xargs -n1 iptables -A FORWARD -j ACCEPT -s)
real 0m32.994s
user 0m1.288s
sys 0m26.076s
* With the nf-next patches :
# time (./list-addrs 3000 | xargs -n1 iptables -A FORWARD -j ACCEPT -s)
real 0m5.428s
user 0m0.068s
sys 0m0.288s
I do notice a significant performance increase.
[1] - https:/ /gist.github. com/williammart in/b75e3faf5964 648299e4d985413 e6c0c
- Eric