Would it be possible to change the title of this bug to make it clear what chipset(s) it covers? I bet I'm not the only one on the list of subscribers who thought this was a generic bug on this persistent-net.rules behavior.
The MAC address doesn't change. In fact, the two entries, eth0 and eth1, in 70-persistent-net.rules both had the same MAC address (I've attached that file over in bug 346885).
Okay, new bug 346885 filed.
Would it be possible to change the title of this bug to make it clear what chipset(s) it covers? I bet I'm not the only one on the list of subscribers who thought this was a generic bug on this persistent- net.rules behavior.
The MAC address doesn't change. In fact, the two entries, eth0 and eth1, in 70-persistent- net.rules both had the same MAC address (I've attached that file over in bug 346885).
Thanks for the comments!