Comment 187 for bug 1470250
Revision history for this message
| Joseph Salisbury (jsalisbury) wrote | #187 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
35a32c5
(Get the code!)
I wasn't able to reproduce the bug using the test kernel with commit da1674843 as the tip and Powershell as the backup client(Using the scripts posted in #182).
I am able to reproduce the bug with that kernel using the Windows Server Backup GUI, it just took 35 hours.
I'm going to keep using Windows Server Backup to get through the bisect. I'll continue to post the current test kernel in here during the bisect. That way others can test in parallel. We can mark a kernel 'BAD' as soon as we hit the bug and move onto the next kernel, but we can't mark a kernel 'GOOD' until we are sure it really is good.
Per comment #186, I'm going to mark kernel adbb4e646 as bad and build/test the next kernel. I'll post a link to the test kernel here as soon as it is built.