Comment 20 for bug 1450755

Revision history for this message
Aaron Whitehouse (aaron-whitehouse) wrote :

For comparison, on Windows 7 (machine in same spot)

Up to 54Mbps
>iperf -c 192.168.0.102
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to 192.168.0.102, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 63.0 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[ 3] local 192.168.0.2 port 49809 connected with 192.168.0.102 port 5001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 3] 0.0-10.1 sec 26.8 MBytes 22.3 Mbits/sec

Changed to Up to 144Mbps

>iperf -c 192.168.0.102
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to 192.168.0.102, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 63.0 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[ 3] local 192.168.0.2 port 49828 connected with 192.168.0.102 port 5001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 66.2 MBytes 55.4 Mbits/sec

Changed to Up to 300Mbps

>iperf -c 192.168.0.102
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to 192.168.0.102, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 63.0 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[ 3] local 192.168.0.2 port 49838 connected with 192.168.0.102 port 5001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 66.5 MBytes 55.7 Mbits/sec

================================================================

So, in summary:

                                                                                  | Mainline 4.5rc5 | Windows 7 |
Up to 54 Mbps | 20.9 Mbps | 22.3 Mbps |
Up to 144Mbps (best for wireless range) | 17.1 Mbps | 55.4 Mbps |
Up to 300Mbps (best for w/ performance) | 19.8 Mbps | 55.7 Mbps |

================================================================