We can see that intel_pstates might actually fail to initialize cpufreq if it ever calls the cpufreq driver initialization and gets an error.
We might be getting a "0" from:
drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c -> pcc_get_freq()
which is called in the code (from commit given):
policy->cur = cpufreq_driver->get(policy->cpu);
During the cpufreq initialization function (__cpufreq_add_dev).
* This is actual the latest code in the kernel and they assume sometimes intel_pstates can fail to initialize cpufreq (even for other cpufreq drivers). If it fails it gives us that warning message pointed out. A workaround could be trying to "disable" and "enable" the core by putting it offline and online again * (Kernel code does not attempt to initialize cpufreq for a second time, for example).
It looks like HP ROM engineering team might want to debug this.
Collaborative Power Control = Enabled
enables "pcc-cpufreq" as the "core communication" between cpufreq driver AND firmware.
https:/ /www.kernel. org/doc/ Documentation/ cpu-freq/ pcc-cpufreq. txt
This is an interface used by HP extensively (HP servers tend to use extensively ACPI and interfaces between OS and firmware).
Judging by comments on commit:
https:/ /lkml.org/ lkml/2014/ 3/20/799
We can see that intel_pstates might actually fail to initialize cpufreq if it ever calls the cpufreq driver initialization and gets an error.
We might be getting a "0" from:
drivers/ cpufreq/ pcc-cpufreq. c -> pcc_get_freq()
which is called in the code (from commit given):
policy->cur = cpufreq_ driver- >get(policy- >cpu);
During the cpufreq initialization function (__cpufreq_ add_dev) .
* This is actual the latest code in the kernel and they assume sometimes intel_pstates can fail to initialize cpufreq (even for other cpufreq drivers). If it fails it gives us that warning message pointed out. A workaround could be trying to "disable" and "enable" the core by putting it offline and online again * (Kernel code does not attempt to initialize cpufreq for a second time, for example).
It looks like HP ROM engineering team might want to debug this.