Both "Vivid" and "mainline" generated appropriate ACPI events for the wireless key. I think this is because:
- In "Vivid" we added a check for this hardware variant and use the alt keymap which I added the wireless key to
- In "mainline" we don't use the alt keymap but commit fec278a means the standard keymap handles the wireless key
- In [1] we don't get the ACPI event, which is strange because I'd expect the same behaviour as "mainline". Which suggests to me this kernel doesn't have change fec278a?
Both "Vivid" and "mainline" generated appropriate ACPI events for the wireless key. I think this is because:
- In "Vivid" we added a check for this hardware variant and use the alt keymap which I added the wireless key to
- In "mainline" we don't use the alt keymap but commit fec278a means the standard keymap handles the wireless key
- In [1] we don't get the ACPI event, which is strange because I'd expect the same behaviour as "mainline". Which suggests to me this kernel doesn't have change fec278a?
[1] http:// kernel. ubuntu. com/~kernel- ppa/mainline/ v3.19-rc6- vivid/