Comment 45 for bug 1339939

Revision history for this message
In , Jikos (jikos) wrote :

(In reply to comment #39)
> Hmm. I missed that the "after initialisation" printk is correct. So perhaps
> all we need is to wait a little longer...

Unfortunately the symptoms are still the same even with timeout == 1000:

[ 54.108192] [drm:init_ring_common] *ERROR* render ring initialization failed ctl 0001f001 (valid? 1) head 000e299c tail 00000008 start 000e4000 [expected 000e4000]
[ 54.108201] Ring render ring after initialisation: 0001f001 000e299c 00000008 000e4000