(In reply to comment #27)
> Indeed. What happens is that UXA now finally detects that the kernel is
> reporting that it cannot execute GPU commands, and instead it falls back to
> CPU rendering directly into the framebuffer.
Understood, thanks. So kernel should probably put a huge warning into dmesg once such condition is detected and workaround applied.
> > to it, although I assume the ring initialization failure still needs to be
> > solved ... ?
>
> Yes. We never knew why g45 failed in the first place, if we can figure out
> what changed now, we may be able to create a better band-aid.
Excellent, thanks. Happy to test any diag patches necessary.
(In reply to comment #27)
> Indeed. What happens is that UXA now finally detects that the kernel is
> reporting that it cannot execute GPU commands, and instead it falls back to
> CPU rendering directly into the framebuffer.
Understood, thanks. So kernel should probably put a huge warning into dmesg once such condition is detected and workaround applied.
> > to it, although I assume the ring initialization failure still needs to be
> > solved ... ?
>
> Yes. We never knew why g45 failed in the first place, if we can figure out
> what changed now, we may be able to create a better band-aid.
Excellent, thanks. Happy to test any diag patches necessary.