> Tobias Oetiker wrote:
> > I have just completed extensive benchmarking on 2.6.31.2 and 2.6.24
> > with a new benchmark program I have written, to measure real-world
> > io performance in high load situations where readers and writers
> > are compeeting.
> >
> > I am looking at HW RAID setups as well a normal single harddrive
> > situations. The bottom line is that on a single harddrive only
> >
> > data=writeback with cfq scheduler
> >
> > has decent performance when readers and writers are in competition
> > and even then, there will be huge outliers of many seconds happeing
> > every now and then. See
> >
> > http://insights.oetiker.ch/linux/fsopbench/
> >
> > for details.
>
> Is that with ext4 or ext3?
Today Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Tobias Oetiker wrote: insights. oetiker. ch/linux/ fsopbench/
> > I have just completed extensive benchmarking on 2.6.31.2 and 2.6.24
> > with a new benchmark program I have written, to measure real-world
> > io performance in high load situations where readers and writers
> > are compeeting.
> >
> > I am looking at HW RAID setups as well a normal single harddrive
> > situations. The bottom line is that on a single harddrive only
> >
> > data=writeback with cfq scheduler
> >
> > has decent performance when readers and writers are in competition
> > and even then, there will be huge outliers of many seconds happeing
> > every now and then. See
> >
> > http://
> >
> > for details.
>
> Is that with ext4 or ext3?
I have tested with ext3
cheers
tobi
-- it.oetiker. ch <email address hidden> ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900
Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland
http://