(In reply to Lv Zheng from comment #214)
> What do you mean by both?
> This - vanilla linux-pm/linux-next + ec-flush{1,2,3,4,5,6}.patch - and which
> one?
The two that you asked me to test: linux-pm/linux-next + ec-flush{1,2,3,4,5,6}.patch and linux-pm/linux-next + ec-flush{1,2,3,4,5,6,7}.patch
> Do you mean currently we are not able to confirm if the patchset can solve
> old problems because a regression prevents the suspend/resume from working?
Yes, once the power plug detection started working again, I was unable to make it fail even if 3.17.y, using plug/unplug/lid switches during suspend. I think we still lack an actual test case...
(In reply to Lv Zheng from comment #214) 1,2,3,4, 5,6}.patch - and which
> What do you mean by both?
> This - vanilla linux-pm/linux-next + ec-flush{
> one?
The two that you asked me to test: linux-pm/linux-next + ec-flush{ 1,2,3,4, 5,6}.patch and linux-pm/linux-next + ec-flush{ 1,2,3,4, 5,6,7}. patch
> Do you mean currently we are not able to confirm if the patchset can solve
> old problems because a regression prevents the suspend/resume from working?
Yes, once the power plug detection started working again, I was unable to make it fail even if 3.17.y, using plug/unplug/lid switches during suspend. I think we still lack an actual test case...