Comment 52 for bug 1259829

Joshua (njj) wrote :

@Offtopic: Isn't it possible to edit previous posts? Because it feels like an monologue to post news comments all the time.

However I opened a thread on the Crucial forum [1] and a nice guy referred me to another thread [2] which tells that the bug is fixed with firmware MU05. And there a two link to kernel mailinglist posts which are blacklisting all Crucial SSDs for queued trim [3] and reverting this for MU05 [4]. Is this the same "whiteliste" the Ubuntu people are talking about? When I want to test trim with newest firmware MU05 is it enough to add "--no-model-check" or do I also have to use a special kernel?

[1] http://forum.crucial.com/t5/Solid-State-Drives-SSD/M500-on-Linux-with-fstrim-or-discard-under-heavy-load-could/td-p/151522
[2] http://forum.crucial.com/t5/Solid-State-Drives-SSD/M500-M5x0-QUEUED-TRIM-data-corruption-alert-mostly-for-Linux/td-p/151028
[3] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/56084
[4] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ide/msg48361.html