Thanks for testing. The bisect indicated one of the two commits introduced the regression:
commit 76a6225bf0b64572251a8c27d33e84afac6af713
Author: Bob Moore <email address hidden>
Date: Fri Mar 8 09:23:16 2013 +0000
ACPICA: Split object conversion functions to a new file
or
commit d5a36100f62fa6db5541344e08b361b34e9114c5
Author: Bob Moore <email address hidden>
Date: Fri Mar 8 09:23:03 2013 +0000
ACPICA: Add mechanism for early object repairs on a per-name basis
It doesn't seem like an easy task to revert these commits. I think we should notify upstream about this as well.
Thanks for testing. The bisect indicated one of the two commits introduced the regression: 2251a8c27d33e84 afac6af713
commit 76a6225bf0b6457
Author: Bob Moore <email address hidden>
Date: Fri Mar 8 09:23:16 2013 +0000
ACPICA: Split object conversion functions to a new file
or
commit d5a36100f62fa6d b5541344e08b361 b34e9114c5
Author: Bob Moore <email address hidden>
Date: Fri Mar 8 09:23:03 2013 +0000
ACPICA: Add mechanism for early object repairs on a per-name basis
It doesn't seem like an easy task to revert these commits. I think we should notify upstream about this as well.
Also, the 3.13-rc2 kernel is now out. Would it be possible for you to test that kernel, to confirm this is not already fixed there: kernel. ubuntu. com/~kernel- ppa/mainline/ v3.13-rc2- trusty/
http://