(there are 2 directories, one for 32bits and another for 64bits)
Could the original bug reporter please also test it and report back?
This is a Raring kernel reverting commit referred in comment #11 (upstream commit 57ab048 "zram: use zram->lock to protect zram_free_page() in swap free notify path"). This commit actually introduces a regression that is fixed upstream but its backport to Raring seems to require a few additional commits.
dac922, thanks a lot for your analysis. I've uploaded a test kernel here:
http:// people. canonical. com/~henrix/ lp1215513/
(there are 2 directories, one for 32bits and another for 64bits)
Could the original bug reporter please also test it and report back?
This is a Raring kernel reverting commit referred in comment #11 (upstream commit 57ab048 "zram: use zram->lock to protect zram_free_page() in swap free notify path"). This commit actually introduces a regression that is fixed upstream but its backport to Raring seems to require a few additional commits.
Thanks.