Ubuntu
linux package

  1. Bug #1215411
  2. Comment #39

Comment 39 for bug 1215411

Revision history for this message
Mate Kukri (mkukri) wrote :

I'm looking at this on +1, and there don't seem to be an obvious forward. Debian has their own SONAME versioning for when the kernel package breaks libcpupower's ABI, but we only have per-kernel-versioned packages.

* Do we want to provide an unversioned linux-tools-dev with a similar ABI-breakage SONAME versioning?
* Do we want to patch these packages (if possible) to not depend on libcpupower?
* Or if no one seems to mind (as it seems from the age of this), how about blocklisting the packages depending on libcpupower-dev from Ubuntu?