John Hupp, regarding your latest post http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2013-September/045293.html , I would recommend changing the BODY of your e-mail to the Summary of this report or it risks being ignored as being general, and undetailed.
Despite this, one would not want to use kernel.org for a potential bug in Flash itself, as this is not their upstream bug tracker. Instead, one would want to first test the latest mainline kernel http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.12-rc2-saucy/ . Assuming it's still reproducible, it would be best to bring in Flash upstream to comment to Chris Wilson's assertion on http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2013-August/043876.html . One may file a report with Flash upstream using the upstream format noted in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/KernelTeamBugPolicies#Kernel.org_Format via https://bugbase.adobe.com/?event=home .
Please feel free to post the report URL when completed.
John Hupp, regarding your latest post http:// lists.freedeskt op.org/ archives/ dri-devel/ 2013-September/ 045293. html , I would recommend changing the BODY of your e-mail to the Summary of this report or it risks being ignored as being general, and undetailed.
Despite this, one would not want to use kernel.org for a potential bug in Flash itself, as this is not their upstream bug tracker. Instead, one would want to first test the latest mainline kernel http:// kernel. ubuntu. com/~kernel- ppa/mainline/ v3.12-rc2- saucy/ . Assuming it's still reproducible, it would be best to bring in Flash upstream to comment to Chris Wilson's assertion on http:// lists.freedeskt op.org/ archives/ dri-devel/ 2013-August/ 043876. html . One may file a report with Flash upstream using the upstream format noted in https:/ /wiki.ubuntu. com/KernelTeam/ KernelTeamBugPo licies# Kernel. org_Format via https:/ /bugbase. adobe.com/ ?event= home .
Please feel free to post the report URL when completed.