Comment 26 for bug 1205741

Revision history for this message
Tim Hartrick (ww3ib-tim-8aw3u) wrote :

Unfortunately in my haste to verify this, I bungled my test of -55 and managed to pull down the wrong source for -55 as well. Now that I have corrected both those mistakes, I can verify that the code for the fix is in -55 and the code for the fix functions properly. Sorry about that.....