Ubuntu Kernel 3.5.0-27 does not boot

Bug #1167114 reported by Petr Gladkikh
264
This bug affects 55 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
linux (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
High
Brad Figg

Bug Description

SRU Justification

Impact:

After upgrading to linux 3.5.0.27.43 my notebook does not boot. Loading recovery version of same linux kernel stops somewhere in the middle and does not even show a console.

Previous version of linux 3.5.0.26 works just fine.

Testing:

Boot a kernel with the relevant patch applied and you should get to a login screen/prompt.

NOTE the linux version reported with apport (3.5.0.26) is last working one not the subject of this bug.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
Package: linux-image-3.5.0-26-generic 3.5.0-26.42
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-26.42-generic 3.5.7.6
Uname: Linux 3.5.0-26-generic i686
ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu10
Architecture: i386
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USER PID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC0: petr 2307 F.... pulseaudio
Date: Wed Apr 10 09:52:11 2013
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=c52d3970-fdbe-4b9a-9705-334803af7f5d
InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-01-12 (87 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 "Quantal Quetzal" - Release i386 (20121017.2)
MachineType: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. B53S
MarkForUpload: True
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcFB:
 0 radeondrmfb
 1 inteldrmfb
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.5.0-26-generic root=/dev/mapper/ubuntu-root ro quiet splash
PulseList:
 Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: Home directory /home/petr not ours.
 No PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon.
RelatedPackageVersions:
 linux-restricted-modules-3.5.0-26-generic N/A
 linux-backports-modules-3.5.0-26-generic N/A
 linux-firmware 1.95
SourcePackage: linux
StagingDrivers: rts5139
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 11/15/2011
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 213
dmi.board.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567
dmi.board.name: B53S
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
dmi.board.version: 1.0
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
dmi.chassis.type: 9
dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
dmi.chassis.version: 1.0
dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr213:bd11/15/2011:svnASUSTeKComputerInc.:pnB53S:pvr1.0:rvnASUSTeKComputerInc.:rnB53S:rvr1.0:cvnASUSTeKComputerInc.:ct9:cvr1.0:
dmi.product.name: B53S
dmi.product.version: 1.0
dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc.

Revision history for this message
Petr Gladkikh (petrglad) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : Status changed to Confirmed

This change was made by a bot.

Changed in linux (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Nathaniel A. Johnson (gruyere-emmentaler) wrote : Re: Linux 3.5.0.27.43 does not boot

I have the same issue - on a desktop computer. This is a dump of some info from duel boot windows. Note: I am able to boot in a recovery mode if I select the Safe Graphics mode. My router does not indicate a live connection to the network card. Please indicate additional information to include to that I can help resolve this problem.

System Manufacturer: Gateway
System Model: DX4300
Processor: AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 810 Processor (4 CPUs), ~2.6GHz
Memory: 8192MB RAM
Card name: ATI Radeon HD 5700 Series
Realtek Digital Output (Realtek High Definition Audio)
Marvell Yukon 88E8071 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller

Revision history for this message
Joseph Salisbury (jsalisbury) wrote :

Can you follow the "Boot options" instructions on the following wiki to enable additional output on boot:

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingKernelBoot

As mentioned on the wiki, it would be great if you can attach a log file which may have captured any messages you see. If you are unable to capture a log file, a digital photo will work just as well. As a last resort you can even copy messages down by hand.

Changed in linux (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → High
tags: added: regression-update
tags: added: needs-bisect
tags: added: kernel-da-key
Revision history for this message
Joseph Salisbury (jsalisbury) wrote :

Also, can you test the latest 3.5 stable kernel to see if this issue is already resolved? It can be downloaded from:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.5.7.9-quantal/

Revision history for this message
Nathaniel A. Johnson (gruyere-emmentaler) wrote :

The wiki page does not (seem to) correspond to this version of grub. A short explanation of how to log boot output to a text file would be helpful. I did remove the quiet and splash options but the other options are different.

Starting with Natty (Ubuntu 11.04), also remove the parameter vt.handoff=7, and on the line that reads set gfxpayload=$linux_gfx_mode, replace with set gfxpayload=text

Does not correspond to what I see. I have a parameter $vt_handoff (that I removed) but no gxfpayload line.
I am going to try the updated kernel suggested. Fingers crossed.

Revision history for this message
Nathaniel A. Johnson (gruyere-emmentaler) wrote :

The latest 3.5 stable kernel got to the login screen but in an incorrect graphics mode and without the mouse or keyboard functioning. I noticed that the Ethernet was connected but the router showed that it was at the low (10mB) speed.

I only upgraded the kernel. I did not upgrade the headers - Is it necessary?

I a currently booted into a kernel that is version 16 from a few weeks ago. Everything is functioning normally with this kernel.

Let me know what to do next and how to assist in debugging. I am not a Linux admin but I am a programmer so I can at least follow instructions :-)

summary: - Linux 3.5.0.27.43 does not boot
+ Ubuntu Kernel 3.5.0-27 does not boot
Revision history for this message
Roman Battaglia (raddyroro) wrote :

I will try this when I get home and report the results

Revision history for this message
Roman Battaglia (raddyroro) wrote :

I tried to edit the boot prefrences via the wiki as you said, the system will still not boot. And the update is the same, therefore I am running on the previous version.

Revision history for this message
Dave Martin (dave-m) wrote :

Confirmed on a Parallels Ubuntu 12.04 Virtual Machine.

linux-image-3.5.0-27-generic:i386 (3.5.0-27.46~precise1) will not boot, whereas 3.5.0-26 is OK.

Revision history for this message
memilanuk (memilanuk) wrote :

I have the same problem... Lenovo ThinkPad T530 that has been running Linux (pretty much any distro) fine until recently. Currently dual-booting Win7 Pro and Ubuntu 12.10. Tried installing Fedora 18 and Fuduntu 2013.1 for multi-boot about a week ago. Live USB worked fine... install went fine... initial boot went fine... downloaded all the necessary updates and rebooted... got the same blank black screen after grub as described here. Given the number of updates applied at the time (hundreds) I literally had no idea where to even look, and just went back to Ubuntu 12.10 as it was still working fine.

Until the last update involving kernel 3.5.0-27. Rebooted... same blank black screen after grub.

Selected the 'Advanced Options' -> 3.5.0-26 generic kernel, and was able to boot normally (like now). When I tried the 3.5.0-27 failsafe kernel, I get partways through the boot cycle but it just hangs at pretty much the exact same point every time.

I'd like to help... but it seems that there is no good way to capture the boot messages when the machine doesn't even make it all the way through to a console? Short of writing down by hand the last few messages displayed on the screen when the machine locks up, and re-posting them here, what can I / we do to help? I mean, I'll do that if thats the only option, but I was hoping there was something else.

Just a thought... given that the three distros mentioned have very different kernel versions (I was told F18 was at something like 3.8.5-201?) it seems that its some small security update that would be common between the different distros that would cause all to recently not boot on certain hardware...?

Revision history for this message
Gregory Kramida (algomorph) wrote :

Also just experienced this on a desktop.

Just installed a bunch of updates, one of which was:
linux-headers-generic:amd64 (3.5.0.26.32, 3.5.0.27.43)

Since the system boots fine into 3.5.0.26, it stands to reason it must be this.
In a duplicate bug report, lots of people reported they have this issue on machines with older Radeon graphics cards,
specifically:

Radeon HD 3000 Series
Radeon HD 4000 Series

From reading the comments here, it seems like the bug also affects systems with other hardware.

Mine falls into the latter category. Off course, I'm running the noveau driver on that, since these HD cards don't support the newer xorg server versions, while noveau's good enough for my purposes not to downgrade.

Could somebody with this problem try to boot into 3.5.0.27 in recovery mode, I know it gets halfway there -- perhaps someone could pull up a root console after issuing a Ctrl-Alt-Del signal when it decides to stop booting? (I apologize, I'm in a bit of a time bind right now.)

I think it would be helpful to see what the "dmesg" command would say about the boot messages, if indeed it would work.

Revision history for this message
memilanuk (memilanuk) wrote :

When it stops booting... Ctrl+Alt+Del just reboots the system, rather than pull up any kind of console, at least for me.

Revision history for this message
Peter Telford (pt3lford) wrote :

I have the same issue but recovery mode gets all the way. I can even get a root prompt. I'm attaching dmesg-27.out and dmesg-26.out from my system for comparison.

Revision history for this message
Rexxy (roland-schmalenberg) wrote :

Got a Lenovo Thinkpad T400 in today for troubleshooting boot problems, same behavior as described above and in comments:
3.5.0-27 kernel won't boot,
3.5.0-26 and older works like a charm.

Revision history for this message
Barry Fishman (barry-fishman) wrote :

I have a radeon HD 4670 display.

While in grub I edited the boot line to include "radeon.modeset=0". This allowed the
system to boot without problems, although the graphical response was very slow.

So I think the problem is due to changes in the radeon driver KMS code.

Revision history for this message
Hendrik Schrieber (hennekn) wrote :

Same problem on Kubuntu 12.10 with "VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI RV620 [Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series]" on Lenovo T400.

Revision history for this message
Luis Henriques (henrix) wrote :

Kernel 3.5.0-27.46 contained a bunch of changes to the radeon driver. Since most (all?) the bug reporters seem to be using a radeon graphic card, I've built a test kernel with all these changes reverted:

ea7e2ec Revert "drm/radeon: add new AMD ACPI header and update relevant code (v2)"
02f3061 Revert "drm/radeon: add a license header to radeon_apci.c"
665bfe9 Revert "drm/radeon: track whether the GPU controls the backlight (v2)"
9acd16c Revert "drm/radeon: rework legacy backlight control"
e09a7a2 Revert "drm/radeon: add backlight control for atom devices (v2)"
d934c3c Revert "drm/radeon: refactor radeon_atif_call"
dfa4cad Revert "drm/radeon: implement radeon_atif_verify_interface"
28b9be5 Revert "drm/radeon: implement wrapper for GET_SYSTEM_PARAMS"
4fe88b6 Revert "drm/radeon: implement handler for ACPI event"
1608812 Revert "drm/radeon: re-organize the acpi notifier callback"
501544d Revert "ACPI video: allow events handlers to veto the keypress"
4ed8dc6 Revert "drm/radeon: block the keypress on ATIF events"

I've uploaded the test kernels (both amd64 and i386) here:

http://people.canonical.com/~henrix/lp1167114/

Could you please git them a try and report back? Thanks.

Revision history for this message
arsen stasic (arsen) wrote :

Luis I have tried your kernel but I wasn't successful.
But I have to admit, I have this issue with Nvidia:

lspci |grep VGA
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GT218 [NVS 3100M] (rev a2)

It a lenovo T410.

Revision history for this message
Nathaniel A. Johnson (gruyere-emmentaler) wrote :

I have tried the kernel as well but it did not work. I am including the output that Arsen included from my -17 kernel that I am running on the same machine.

01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI RS780 [Radeon HD 3200]
02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI Juniper [Radeon HD 5700 Series]

For any other people that haven't done this before, I found this link on uninstalling old kernels (so I could use the Ubuntu Software Center without it telling me that I have a newer version installed)

http://askubuntu.com/questions/153185/how-to-remove-kernels-from-previous-release

Let me know if there is anything else I can do to help debug.

-Nathaniel

Revision history for this message
Vreixo Formoso (metalpain2002) wrote :

I have the same problem with no ATI card but NVIDIA:

lspci |grep VGA
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller (rev 09)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GK107 [GeForce GT 650M] (rev a1)

Revision history for this message
xtsbdu3reyrbrmroezob (xtsbdu3reyrbrmroezob) wrote : Re: [Bug 1167114] Re: Ubuntu Kernel 3.5.0-27 does not boot

Does everyone here have TWO or more graphics chips on their hardware?
That's the problem I have. Think it may be the root cause.
On Apr 12, 2013 9:55 AM, "Vreixo Formoso" <email address hidden> wrote:

> I have the same problem with no ATI card but NVIDIA:
>
> lspci |grep VGA
> 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 3rd Gen Core
> processor Graphics Controller (rev 09)
> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GK107 [GeForce GT
> 650M] (rev a1)
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
> duplicate bug report (1163512).
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167114
>
> Title:
> Ubuntu Kernel 3.5.0-27 does not boot
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1167114/+subscriptions
>

Revision history for this message
Barry Fishman (barry-fishman) wrote :

Re: comment 21 by Luis Henriques (henrix)

I have a Radeon HD 4670 frame buffer.

I installed all your amd64 debian files. There was no change.

I noticed that the network card never initialized itself (the light on my router never changed from yellow to green). The keyboard had enough functionality so that the NumLock light would respond to pressing that key. I still could not catch the last contents of the console window.

 Again if I added "radeon.modeset=0" to the boot, things worked with a much slower display.

Revision history for this message
memilanuk (memilanuk) wrote :

I have the onboard 'integrated' video plus Nvidia Optimus on my
laptop... think I'll try switching to integrated only in the BIOS and
see if that helps.

On 04/12/2013 07:13 AM, Kristian Erik Hermansen wrote:
> Does everyone here have TWO or more graphics chips on their hardware?
> That's the problem I have. Think it may be the root cause.
> On Apr 12, 2013 9:55 AM, "Vreixo Formoso" <email address hidden> wrote:
>
>> I have the same problem with no ATI card but NVIDIA:
>>
>> lspci |grep VGA
>> 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 3rd Gen Core
>> processor Graphics Controller (rev 09)
>> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GK107 [GeForce GT
>> 650M] (rev a1)
>>
>> --
>> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
>> duplicate bug report (1163512).
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167114
>>
>> Title:
>> Ubuntu Kernel 3.5.0-27 does not boot
>>
>> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1167114/+subscriptions
>>

Revision history for this message
Gregory Kramida (algomorph) wrote :

@Kristian wrote "Does everyone here have TWO or more graphics chips on their hardware?"):

No, my box that failed on the 3.5.0.27.43 kernel has only one Radeon HD card, 4000 series.
I am on an NVIDIA GeForce 260 box right now, still haven't tried.

Revision history for this message
flyingfischer (info-flyingfischer) wrote :

Two graphic cards:

VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 09)
VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GF106GLM [Quadro 2000M] (rev a1)

If I try to debug the kernel on boot with these instructions, the Laptop will boot 2 out of 3 times!

setting gfxpayload to text and removing quiet spash $vt.handoff

On the not successful boot, the screen remains black. On the successfull boots I get the attached boot.log.

Revision history for this message
memilanuk (memilanuk) wrote :

Well, some success here... I was also troubleshooting some battery life issues; namely why another T530 user was seeing 7+ hrs life vs. less than 3 for me. Turns out I didn't have separate drivers installed for my nVidia Optimus card. I added the drivers using the instructions here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bumblebee and suddenly I can boot up with kernel 3.5.0-27 no problemo - and battery life is considerably improved.

Revision history for this message
Barry Fishman (barry-fishman) wrote :

Re: comment 25 by Kristian Erik Hermansen

I also seem to have two display controllers.

lspci | grep VGA
01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI RS780L [Radeon HD 3000]
02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI RV730XT [Radeon HD 4670]

The ASUS CG1330-07 came with the onboard graphics ports sealed off.

Revision history for this message
Luis Henriques (henrix) wrote :

Ok, so it looks like I was wrong about the radeon driver changes. Could anyone hitting this issue check if the box is still alive and try to login through the network (ssh, for example)? It would be great if we could get a kernel log (you can use dmesg to get it).

Revision history for this message
xtsbdu3reyrbrmroezob (xtsbdu3reyrbrmroezob) wrote :

@Gregory...are you sure? What does lspci | grep VGA show you?
On Apr 12, 2013 10:45 AM, "Gregory Kramida" <email address hidden> wrote:

> @Kristian wrote "Does everyone here have TWO or more graphics chips on
> their hardware?"):
>
> No, my box that failed on the 3.5.0.27.43 kernel has only one Radeon HD
> card, 4000 series.
> I am on an NVIDIA GeForce 260 box right now, still haven't tried.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
> duplicate bug report (1163512).
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167114
>
> Title:
> Ubuntu Kernel 3.5.0-27 does not boot
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1167114/+subscriptions
>

Revision history for this message
memilanuk (memilanuk) wrote :

FWIW, this is what mine shows:

monte@machin-shin:~$ lspci | grep VGA
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller (rev 09)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GF108 [Quadro NVS 5400M] (rev ff)

Revision history for this message
xtsbdu3reyrbrmroezob (xtsbdu3reyrbrmroezob) wrote :

I think this bug is leaning toward a dual video chip problem that the new
kernel fails to handle properly...
On Apr 12, 2013 12:01 PM, "memilanuk" <email address hidden> wrote:

> FWIW, this is what mine shows:
>
> monte@machin-shin:~$ lspci | grep VGA
> 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 3rd Gen Core
> processor Graphics Controller (rev 09)
> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GF108 [Quadro NVS
> 5400M] (rev ff)
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
> duplicate bug report (1163512).
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167114
>
> Title:
> Ubuntu Kernel 3.5.0-27 does not boot
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1167114/+subscriptions
>

Revision history for this message
Gregory Kramida (algomorph) wrote :

@Kristian,
yes, I am sure. The box is in another location at this moment, I cannot run the command for you.

As I'm sure many of us do, I assemble my boxes. It has a GIGABYTE GV-R455D3-512I Radeon HD 4550 card, mounted on the PCIe x16 2.0 slot.

However, the computer also has a Intel Core i5-2400 Sandy Bridge processor, which comes with a built-in Intel HD Graphics 2000 GPU. That GPU is not active, as in - only the graphics card is being used by a single screen.

Revision history for this message
xtsbdu3reyrbrmroezob (xtsbdu3reyrbrmroezob) wrote :

Gregory...so you do have two chips. Thats what we all share in common.
That's what is causing the kernel to fail to boot.
On Apr 12, 2013 12:15 PM, "Gregory Kramida" <email address hidden> wrote:

> @Kristian,
> yes, I am sure. The box is in another location at this moment, I cannot
> run the command for you.
>
> As I'm sure many of us do, I assemble my boxes. It has a GIGABYTE GV-
> R455D3-512I Radeon HD 4550 card, mounted on the PCIe x16 2.0 slot.
>
> However, the computer also has a Intel Core i5-2400 Sandy Bridge
> processor, which comes with a built-in Intel HD Graphics 2000 GPU. That
> GPU is not active, as in - only the graphics card is being used by a
> single screen.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
> duplicate bug report (1163512).
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167114
>
> Title:
> Ubuntu Kernel 3.5.0-27 does not boot
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1167114/+subscriptions
>

Revision history for this message
flyingfischer (info-flyingfischer) wrote :

Network connectivity is established after the bug causes the box to hang...

...it is not possible to ssh from another machine while the box hangs on booting.

Revision history for this message
Hendrik Schrieber (hennekn) wrote :

I also have a built in Intel chip in addition to the radeon card. Couldn't find anything in logs after reboot. Will try to ssh or find another way to extract logs on hang on monday.

Revision history for this message
Petr Gladkikh (petrglad) wrote :

If I open GRUB menu before booting sometimes kernel boots successfully (I am writing this on it). Successful dmesg is in attachment.

When I boot default configuration system stalls with blank screen (however crtl+alt+del works).
If I boot "recovery mode" option system stops with last boot messages in text mode.

Boot output screenshots are here
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B0PNJnCBTt7wX05vMWJFZVRzRjA&usp=sharing

Note that there is some call trace in first three screens.

Revision history for this message
Petr Gladkikh (petrglad) wrote :

The link in previous post does not seem to work properly
screenshots are in attachment.

Revision history for this message
Petr Gladkikh (petrglad) wrote :

I tried linux-image-3.5.7-03050709-generic_3.5.7-03050709.201303280635_i386.deb and it boots every time.

(Leaving aside that my wireless mouse does not work, text consoles (ctrl-alt-f*) show blank screen, screen resolution is skewed, grub config changed during it's installation) version 3.5.7-03050709.201303280635 does not have this issue :)

Revision history for this message
Vreixo Formoso (metalpain2002) wrote :

Solution by memilanuk in #30 seems to work for me. After installing bumblebee I have not experienced the bug anymore...

Revision history for this message
Petr Gladkikh (petrglad) wrote :

I do not have Nvidia in the notebook. My config is Intel i7 with HD 3000 + Radeon so bumblebee is not a solution in my case.

Revision history for this message
xtsbdu3reyrbrmroezob (xtsbdu3reyrbrmroezob) wrote :

Doesn't work for me either. I have nvidia.
On Apr 13, 2013 12:50 PM, "Petr Gladkikh" <email address hidden>
wrote:

> I do not have Nvidia in the notebook. My config is Intel i7 with HD
> 3000 + Radeon so bumblebee is not a solution in my case.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
> duplicate bug report (1163512).
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167114
>
> Title:
> Ubuntu Kernel 3.5.0-27 does not boot
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1167114/+subscriptions
>

Revision history for this message
Richard Brown (browniandynamics) wrote :

Same problem with Thinkpad W530 Ubuntu 12.10, nVidia and Intel graphics.

Revision history for this message
Nathaniel A. Johnson (gruyere-emmentaler) wrote :

Everything Petr is pretty much the same with me. I have two Radeon HD video cards and had the same results with 64 bit 3.5.7 kernel (boot with no low/slow graphics and no peripherals).

Revision history for this message
aeolibus (aeolibus) wrote :

Asus laptop K93SV, graphics = GeForce GT 540M (GF108)

Hangs during boot after upgrade to 3.5.0-27-generic, black screen.

3.5.0.27 always kept working

Have installed bumblebee, booted successful in 3.5.0.27 several times. (thanks for the suggestion memilanuk ! )

Before bumblebee I tampered a bit with grub loader, boot with "nomodeset" followed by boot with "no splash" sometimes worked. But it was not consistently repeatable as if not all boots broke off at exactly the same step.

(fyi added copy of syslog)

Revision history for this message
Luis Henriques (henrix) wrote :

Petr, thank you for your screenshots. Could you please test the kernel currently in the -proposed pocket? It has some fixes that could be relevant. (Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for details on how to enable the -proposed pocket). Thanks.

Revision history for this message
Petr Gladkikh (petrglad) wrote :

I tried 3.5.0.28 and this version have same issue. The error message is the same (AFAICT) and the kernel boots only sometimes.

Revision history for this message
Igor A Tarasov (dicr) wrote :

This bug also affected me.
Last working kernel was 3.5.0-26.
Starting from 3.5.0-27 and 3.5.0-28 system booting with the black screen.
Workaround is to add 'nomodeset' boot option, but the screen resolution in Gnome will not proportional.

Revision history for this message
Christopher (soft-kristal) wrote :

Same issue on my eMachines desktop. I installed Raring on a seperate partition with the same result. It doesn't detect the monitor.

I have both 12.10 and 13.04 running well on my laptops with the latest kernels.

Revision history for this message
celso (celsohenriques20-hotmail) wrote :

I am having this issue too. I am using ubuntu 12.04.1 and have intel HD3000 and ati 5400 series i am having random black screens but surprisingly, i am not having with FGLRX. i download ubuntu 12.04.1 and i dont have that bug. It only happens after install the updates and restart.

Revision history for this message
celso (celsohenriques20-hotmail) wrote :

(sorry, the other coment was confusing)
I am having this issue too. I am using ubuntu 12.04.1 and with intel HD3000 and ati 5400 series i am having random black screens but surprisingly, i am not having when i install FGLRX and disable the intel one. i download ubuntu 12.04.1 and only have that bug only after install the updates and restart.

Revision history for this message
Geert Jan Alsem (gj-alsem) wrote :

After upgrading my Nvidia Optimus powered laptop to 3.5.0-27 I experienced this bug, so I switched back to 3.5.0-26. But yesterday I wasn't watching the GRUB menu and accidentally booted to 3.5.0-27, and all of a sudden it worked again. No idea what changed, I did install some other updates in between, but no kernel updates. I haven't tried 3.5.0-28 yet.

Revision history for this message
arsen stasic (arsen) wrote :

Solution by memilanuk in #30 seems to work for me too. After installing bumblebee I have not experienced the bug anymore.

lspci |grep VGA
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GT218 [NVS 3100M] (rev a2)

Its a Lenovo T410

Revision history for this message
xtsbdu3reyrbrmroezob (xtsbdu3reyrbrmroezob) wrote :

New kernel 3.5.0-28 appears to boot and works OK. No idea if the graphics support is stable or not though (seems slow to me after a while of usage -- random hiccups, etc).

Revision history for this message
Igor Tarasov (tarasov-igor) wrote :

Kernel 3.5.0-28 is also affected.

The problem is, it does not occur every boot.

Revision history for this message
Christopher Manning (h-launchpad-christophermanning-org) wrote :

I just updated to kernel 3.5.0-27, rebooted, and then got stuck at a blank black screen after grub.

I am using a lenovo T530

> lspci | grep VGA
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller (rev 09)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GF108 [Quadro NVS 5400M] (rev a1)

Using grub advanced options to boot using 3.5.0-26 works.

Revision history for this message
Yngve Hoejrup (yngvehoejrup) wrote :

I having the same problem as other with kernel 3.5.0.27, and using NVIDIA graphic card on a Intel® Core™ i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz × 8. I'm in doubt of if kernel 3.5.0.28 is solving the problem and I'm also in doubt of if any body actually knows what the problem is. So are there anythink I could do to provide you with more information that encapsolate the root cause to problem?

I'm not an expert in Ubuntu, so please describe exactly what to do.

Revision history for this message
Nathaniel A. Johnson (gruyere-emmentaler) wrote :

@Yngve I am like you. I uninstalled -27 and am using my previous version until a viable fix comes out. AFIK there is no real rush in upgrading the kernel and so uninstalling will revert your normal boot to a working kernel . I uninstalled it through the software center: Run Ubuntu Software Center. Go to Installed tab. Make sure you uncheck the box at the bottom that says "Show xxxx installed technical items" then do a search for linux kernel image and uninstall -27. Be sure you have another working kernel in your boot loader - Grub2 Advanced Options should show several kernels if you have been using Ubuntu for even a short time. There are instructions in earlier messages in this thread on how to select a different kernel. Then just wait out the bug until it is resolved. I try the various solutions proposed (none have worked for me yet) just to try to help. I hope this helps

Revision history for this message
Richard Brown (browniandynamics) wrote :

I think, the solution from #61 Johnson is so far the most effective one. Plus it's really a good idea to just revert to an older version of kernel and wait for the ubuntu guys to fix the problem. It is really helpful for me with a Thinkpad W530!

what I did is:
1. change BIOS confiuration to use integrated graphic card
2. reboot (from any kernel)
3. remove the kernel version 27 from Synaptic
4. change the BIOS back to NVIDIA graphic card
5. Reboot using kernel 26. (it is strange that the kernel 27 is still in my grub list)

Hope this will be helpful!

Revision history for this message
Alec MacLean (alec-g) wrote :

Same issue with 3/5/0-27-generic with
12.10 on a DELL XPS (sub-model L702X)

Graphics config is:
:~$ lspci | grep VGA
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 09)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GF106 [GeForce GT 555M] (rev a1)

I am going to try process recommended in #61 by Nathaniel.

Revision history for this message
arsen stasic (arsen) wrote :

@alec @Yngve and all of you who are using NVIDIA try to install bumblebee from #30
It works for me with 3.5.0-27

Revision history for this message
xtsbdu3reyrbrmroezob (xtsbdu3reyrbrmroezob) wrote :

We need an upstream fix and not one off fixes for individual graphics
cards...
On Apr 18, 2013 4:11 AM, "arsen stasic" <email address hidden> wrote:

> @alec @Yngve and all of you who are using NVIDIA try to install bumblebee
> from #30
> It works for me with 3.5.0-27
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
> duplicate bug report (1163512).
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167114
>
> Title:
> Ubuntu Kernel 3.5.0-27 does not boot
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1167114/+subscriptions
>

Revision history for this message
arsen stasic (arsen) wrote :

@kristian you are absolutely right! But as log we are waiting for an
upstream fix bumblebee fixes the problem with NVIDIA and the latest
(3.5.0-27) kernel and nobody is forced to remove the latest kernel or to
change grub to boot 3.5.0-26.

Revision history for this message
Steve Conklin (sconklin) wrote :

There are bisection kernels we're using in an attempt to locate this problem, located here:

http://people.canonical.com/~sconklin/quantal-bisection/

The most recent one is in the top directory, and all older ones are in the old/ directory.

Please test them in order, and report in this bug for each one whether you still have the problem or not. Include the kernel version in the report.

Thanks, this testing is valuable.

For future reference, these kernels were generated using:
# bad: [952b77ad6885b9db4837853a88f5c931dee553d6] UBUNTU: Ubuntu-3.5.0-27.43
# good: [7c088a33fdd4ac05ec70bd1031e3e932d0dee883] UBUNTU: Ubuntu-3.5.0-26.42
git bisect start 'Ubuntu-3.5.0-27.43' 'Ubuntu-3.5.0-26.42'

Steve Conklin (sconklin)
Changed in linux (Ubuntu):
assignee: nobody → Steve Conklin (sconklin)
Revision history for this message
Nathaniel A. Johnson (gruyere-emmentaler) wrote :
Download full text (3.2 KiB)

@Steve Conklin- This is a kernel testing question. Do we need to install
the headers for these kernels in order to test them. It is my understand
that those headers are only relevant to system developers.

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Steve Conklin
<email address hidden>wrote:

> ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
> Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Conklin (sconklin)
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167114
>
> Title:
> Ubuntu Kernel 3.5.0-27 does not boot
>
> Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu:
> Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> After upgrading to linux 3.5.0.27.43 my notebook does not boot.
> Loading recovery version of same linux kernel stops somewhere in the
> middle and does not even show a console.
>
> Previous version of linux 3.5.0.26 works just fine.
>
> NOTE the linux version reported with apport (3.5.0.26) is last working
> one not the subject of this bug.
>
> ProblemType: Bug
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
> Package: linux-image-3.5.0-26-generic 3.5.0-26.42
> ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-26.42-generic 3.5.7.6
> Uname: Linux 3.5.0-26-generic i686
> ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu10
> Architecture: i386
> AudioDevicesInUse:
> USER PID ACCESS COMMAND
> /dev/snd/controlC0: petr 2307 F.... pulseaudio
> Date: Wed Apr 10 09:52:11 2013
> EcryptfsInUse: Yes
> HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=c52d3970-fdbe-4b9a-9705-334803af7f5d
> InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-01-12 (87 days ago)
> InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 "Quantal Quetzal" - Release i386
> (20121017.2)
> MachineType: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. B53S
> MarkForUpload: True
> ProcEnviron:
> TERM=xterm
> PATH=(custom, no user)
> LANG=en_US.UTF-8
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> ProcFB:
> 0 radeondrmfb
> 1 inteldrmfb
> ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.5.0-26-generic
> root=/dev/mapper/ubuntu-root ro quiet splash
> PulseList:
> Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: Home
> directory /home/petr not ours.
> No PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon.
> RelatedPackageVersions:
> linux-restricted-modules-3.5.0-26-generic N/A
> linux-backports-modules-3.5.0-26-generic N/A
> linux-firmware 1.95
> SourcePackage: linux
> StagingDrivers: rts5139
> UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
> dmi.bios.date: 11/15/2011
> dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
> dmi.bios.version: 213
> dmi.board.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567
> dmi.board.name: B53S
> dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
> dmi.board.version: 1.0
> dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
> dmi.chassis.type: 9
> dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
> dmi.chassis.version: 1.0
> dmi.modalias:
> dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr213:bd11/15/2011:svnASUSTeKComputerInc.:pnB53S:pvr1.0:rvnASUSTeKComputerInc.:rnB53S:rvr1.0:cvnASUSTeKComputerInc.:ct9:cvr1.0:
> dmi.product.name: B53S
> dmi.product.version: 1.0
> dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs...

Read more...

Revision history for this message
Barry Fishman (barry-fishman) wrote :

I installed the bisection kernels referenced in Message #67

Everything works fine with this kernel.

Revision history for this message
Nathaniel A. Johnson (gruyere-emmentaler) wrote :

@Steve Conklin - I installed all three files and it worked perfectly. Graphics seem normal and all peripherals are available. Please let me know if you need additional information and how to capture it.

I installed these 3 files via the Download and Software update Center
linux-image-3.5.0-27-generic_3.5.0-27.43~spcbisect01_amd64.deb
linux-image-extra-3.5.0-27-generic_3.5.0-27.43~spcbisect01_amd64.deb
linux-headers-3.5.0-27-generic_3.5.0-27.43~spcbisect01_amd64.deb

Revision history for this message
Richard Brown (browniandynamics) wrote :

@ Steve, just to confirm that I just installed the latest bisection kernels (all three files as Nathaniel did). They seem to work fine, at least the booting is smooth now, not sure if it's slower or not!

Revision history for this message
Steve Conklin (sconklin) wrote :

ok, I'm glad to know they work for you. Have you booted more than one time? Some of the reports of this state that it doesn't hang every time, so if you can do it, it's valuable to boot multiple times and also boot after a complete power-down, to make sure that none of the hardware devices still hold any past configuration.

Thanks

Revision history for this message
aeolibus (aeolibus) wrote :

Asus laptop K93SV, graphics = GeForce GT 540M (GF108) ubuntu 12.10

don't know whether this helps anyone

Wanted to share following observations, have been able to make three stable (problem free )installs of Kernel 3.5.0.27-generic on different partitions#46 currently offered by USC after fresh install :
i) make install of Ubuntu (stick or DVD) without the 3rd party package;
ii) on first boot after install make all the available updates via Softwre Updater without the Kernel 3.5.0.27 updates (unclick them)
iii) reboot and then update to Kernel 3.5.0.27 via Softwre Updater
iv) reboot and install "Ubuntu Restricted Extras" via Ubuntu software Center in order to get 3rd party stuff for flash and other proprietary additions.

Other trials of installs 12.10 with 3rd party package included during install all led to unbootable versions after the update to Kernel 3.5.0.27 whatever the sequence of updates.

current stable config :

uname -a =
http://paste.ubuntu.com/5719790/

dpkg -l =
http://paste.ubuntu.com/5719822/

lshw =
http://paste.ubuntu.com/5719876/

Revision history for this message
Barry Fishman (barry-fishman) wrote :

Concerning Message #67

As I said, the spcbisect01_amd64 kernel works fine. I tried booting it several times and running it for a while.

There is a reference to other kernels to try but old/ subdirectory that you mentioned does not seem to exist.

Revision history for this message
Celso Henriques (celsohenriques20) wrote :

Steve, any suspicious about what is causing this?

Regards!

Revision history for this message
Steve Conklin (sconklin) wrote :

Celso, the spcbisect01 kernel is the first one in the bisection series. When more are posted, the existing ones will be put in old/

I'll have another kernel to test soon

Revision history for this message
Steve Conklin (sconklin) wrote :

Nathanial - in general you don't need the headers, BUT - if you've installed any drivers which build automatically using dkms (such as nvidia proprietary drivers), you need the headers. It's safest to install them, it "only" uses disk space.

You can uninstall them later.

Celso - no suspicions, that's why I'm bisecting to find out. There are still more than 40 patches in the next bisection which could have caused it.

I'm making new kernels now

Revision history for this message
Steve Conklin (sconklin) wrote :

ok, the next kernels are in place. Build info:

# bad: [952b77ad6885b9db4837853a88f5c931dee553d6] UBUNTU: Ubuntu-3.5.0-27.43
# good: [7c088a33fdd4ac05ec70bd1031e3e932d0dee883] UBUNTU: Ubuntu-3.5.0-26.42
git bisect start 'Ubuntu-3.5.0-27.43' 'Ubuntu-3.5.0-26.42'
# good: [5528a50f5164e8807647aae932c8261733ea868d] ext4: check bh in ext4_read_block_bitmap()
git bisect good 5528a50f5164e8807647aae932c8261733ea868d

Revision history for this message
Barry Fishman (barry-fishman) wrote :

The kernel 3.5.0-27.43~spcbisect02_amd64 does not work for me.

Back to the same black screen symptoms.

Revision history for this message
Nathaniel A. Johnson (gruyere-emmentaler) wrote :

@Steve I am making sure that I understand this correctly based on this git documentation:
http://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Debugging-with-Git

We need to test Ubuntu-3.5.0-27.43 since we know Ubuntu-3.5.0-27.42 is now marked as good. (I have not used git at this level before)

Revision history for this message
khink (kees-fmf) wrote :

Steve thanks, the bisect01-version fixed it. The newer bisect02 does not.

NVIDIA Corporation Device 0de8 (rev a1)

Revision history for this message
Richard Brown (browniandynamics) wrote :

@Steve, Just to confirm that the kernel 3.5.0-27.43~spcbisect02 doesn't work. It ended up with a blank screen again.

Revision history for this message
Nathaniel A. Johnson (gruyere-emmentaler) wrote :

@steve I am also confirming that bisect2 doesn't work but bisect1 did work.

Revision history for this message
Petr Gladkikh (petrglad) wrote :

To #78: I tested those kernels

linux-image-3.5.0-27-generic_3.5.0-27.43~spcbisect01_amd64.deb GOOD
linux-image-3.5.0-27-generic_3.5.0-27.43~spcbisect02_amd64.deb BAD

Revision history for this message
Helge Meinhard (helge-meinhard) wrote :

I have seen the very same problem on two different laptops, both with dual VGA configs (Intel and Radeon, Intels are 8086:0106 and 8086:0166 respectively, Radeon is 1002:6840 in both cases). 3.5.0-26 works, 3.5.0-27 doesn't.

One laptop allows for disabling the Radeon in the BIOS - 3.5.0-27 works fine then. Clearly the problem is related with dual VGAs.

Back to dual VGA in BIOS, I tried the two bisection kernels - same as others reported already, bisect01 works, bisect02 does not.

All this is with the amd64 kernels.

Revision history for this message
celso (celsohenriques20-hotmail) wrote :

Sorry to say but i can't test the bug. My acer 3820tg is dead so, i plan to buy another but with an integrated graphics only. Probably inteh HD3000. Friends i wish you good luck to find the bug!

Regards

Revision history for this message
khink (kees-fmf) wrote :

Update: For some reason the bug appeared again, making the screen go black ervey reboot (tried 3 times). Re-installing the .debs (bisect01) helped.

Helge's assumption seems to hold for my laptop (Lenovo Thinkpad S430), if "dual VGA" means 2 different VGA lines showing up in lspci:
$ lspci |grep VGA
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller (rev 09)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation Device 0de8 (rev a1)

Revision history for this message
Steve Conklin (sconklin) wrote :

Thanks!

Building more kernels. Stand by.

Revision history for this message
Steve Conklin (sconklin) wrote :

A patch has been identified which is known to cause problems in both precise and quantal kernels. Since people running both series are piling onto this bug, I'm posting the links for each.

Please test the appropriate kernel for you installation, and report whether you still have the problem. This is important, as there are some indications that we may be chasing multiple problems with these bugs.

Please report both success and failure, and include youe kernel version when you make your report.

Precise test kernels are located here:

http://people.canonical.com/~sconklin/precise-revert-4c443ec/

Quantal test kernels are located here:

http://people.canonical.com/~sconklin/quantal-revert-4c443ec/

Thank you for your help!

Revision history for this message
xtsbdu3reyrbrmroezob (xtsbdu3reyrbrmroezob) wrote :

I can confirm the latest kernel broke everything again :( wtf

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Steve Conklin
<email address hidden> wrote:
> A patch has been identified which is known to cause problems in both
> precise and quantal kernels. Since people running both series are piling
> onto this bug, I'm posting the links for each.
>
> Please test the appropriate kernel for you installation, and report
> whether you still have the problem. This is important, as there are some
> indications that we may be chasing multiple problems with these bugs.
>
> Please report both success and failure, and include youe kernel version
> when you make your report.
>
> Precise test kernels are located here:
>
> http://people.canonical.com/~sconklin/precise-revert-4c443ec/
>
> Quantal test kernels are located here:
>
> http://people.canonical.com/~sconklin/quantal-revert-4c443ec/
>
>
> Thank you for your help!
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
> duplicate bug report (1163512).
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167114
>
> Title:
> Ubuntu Kernel 3.5.0-27 does not boot
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1167114/+subscriptions

--
Kristian Erik Hermansen
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kristianhermansen
https://profiles.google.com/kristian.hermansen

Revision history for this message
Barry Fishman (barry-fishman) wrote :

I tried the test kernel 3.5.0-28.47~spcrevertedb777ab9_amd64 and it failed.

The linux-headers could not be installed due to dependency issues with not having the 3.5.0-28 more general header packages.

Revision history for this message
xtsbdu3reyrbrmroezob (xtsbdu3reyrbrmroezob) wrote :

Anyone know if Ubuntu 13.04 coming out in a few days works or is still
broken? If so, this is going to be very bad mojo for Ubuntu...

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Barry Fishman
<email address hidden> wrote:
> I tried the test kernel 3.5.0-28.47~spcrevertedb777ab9_amd64 and it
> failed.
>
> The linux-headers could not be installed due to dependency issues with
> not having the 3.5.0-28 more general header packages.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
> duplicate bug report (1163512).
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167114
>
> Title:
> Ubuntu Kernel 3.5.0-27 does not boot
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1167114/+subscriptions

--
Kristian Erik Hermansen
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kristianhermansen
https://profiles.google.com/kristian.hermansen

Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote :

Taking over from Steve, the next set of bisect kernels can be found at:

http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~bradf/lp1167114/01/

Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote :

git bisect log
# bad: [952b77ad6885b9db4837853a88f5c931dee553d6] UBUNTU: Ubuntu-3.5.0-27.43
# good: [7c088a33fdd4ac05ec70bd1031e3e932d0dee883] UBUNTU: Ubuntu-3.5.0-26.42
git bisect start 'Ubuntu-3.5.0-27.43' 'Ubuntu-3.5.0-26.42'
# good: [5528a50f5164e8807647aae932c8261733ea868d] ext4: check bh in ext4_read_block_bitmap()
git bisect good 5528a50f5164e8807647aae932c8261733ea868d
# bad: [310871eacb882ad9252da3080dbf45bf8988ff8c] sparc64: Fix gfp_flags setting in tsb_grow().
git bisect bad 310871eacb882ad9252da3080dbf45bf8988ff8c

Revision history for this message
Barry Fishman (barry-fishman) wrote :

Re: Message 93

I tried the 3.5.0-28-generic_3.5.0-28.48~bjf+lp1167114+01 bisect kernel and it failed to boot.

Revision history for this message
Gregory Kramida (algomorph) wrote :

Nothing wrong with the mojo, but very bad juju :-)

On 04/22/2013 03:55 PM, Kristian Erik Hermansen wrote:
> Anyone know if Ubuntu 13.04 coming out in a few days works or is still
> broken? If so, this is going to be very bad mojo for Ubuntu...
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Barry Fishman
> <email address hidden> wrote:
>> I tried the test kernel 3.5.0-28.47~spcrevertedb777ab9_amd64 and it
>> failed.
>>
>> The linux-headers could not be installed due to dependency issues with
>> not having the 3.5.0-28 more general header packages.
>>
>> --
>> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
>> duplicate bug report (1163512).
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167114
>>
>> Title:
>> Ubuntu Kernel 3.5.0-27 does not boot
>>
>> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1167114/+subscriptions
>

Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote :

The next set of bisect kernels can be found at:

http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~bradf/lp1167114/02/

git bisect log | tee ../bisect.log
# bad: [952b77ad6885b9db4837853a88f5c931dee553d6] UBUNTU: Ubuntu-3.5.0-27.43
# good: [7c088a33fdd4ac05ec70bd1031e3e932d0dee883] UBUNTU: Ubuntu-3.5.0-26.42
git bisect start 'Ubuntu-3.5.0-27.43' 'Ubuntu-3.5.0-26.42'
# good: [5528a50f5164e8807647aae932c8261733ea868d] ext4: check bh in ext4_read_block_bitmap()
git bisect good 5528a50f5164e8807647aae932c8261733ea868d
# bad: [310871eacb882ad9252da3080dbf45bf8988ff8c] sparc64: Fix gfp_flags setting in tsb_grow().
git bisect bad 310871eacb882ad9252da3080dbf45bf8988ff8c
# bad: [3eafbd7e92c8e6401cbc476dff2a019bc0536b70] drm: don't add inferred modes for monitors that don't support them
git bisect bad 3eafbd7e92c8e6401cbc476dff2a019bc0536b70

Revision history for this message
Barry Fishman (barry-fishman) wrote :

I tried the 3.5.0-28-generic_3.5.0-28.48~bjf+lp1167114+02_amd64 kernel and it boots just fine.

Revision history for this message
Barry Fishman (barry-fishman) wrote :

The Debian bug #704933:
    http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704933
might be the same bug. It has a fix.

It is caused by the "fbcon locking fixes" patch.
   http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2013-January/033976.html

Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote :

The next set of bisect kernels can be found at:

http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~bradf/lp1167114/03/

git bisect log
# bad: [952b77ad6885b9db4837853a88f5c931dee553d6] UBUNTU: Ubuntu-3.5.0-27.43
# good: [7c088a33fdd4ac05ec70bd1031e3e932d0dee883] UBUNTU: Ubuntu-3.5.0-26.42
git bisect start 'Ubuntu-3.5.0-27.43' 'Ubuntu-3.5.0-26.42'
# good: [5528a50f5164e8807647aae932c8261733ea868d] ext4: check bh in ext4_read_block_bitmap()
git bisect good 5528a50f5164e8807647aae932c8261733ea868d
# bad: [310871eacb882ad9252da3080dbf45bf8988ff8c] sparc64: Fix gfp_flags setting in tsb_grow().
git bisect bad 310871eacb882ad9252da3080dbf45bf8988ff8c
# bad: [3eafbd7e92c8e6401cbc476dff2a019bc0536b70] drm: don't add inferred modes for monitors that don't support them
git bisect bad 3eafbd7e92c8e6401cbc476dff2a019bc0536b70
# good: [955062c7a1fbf79550f70085ee38c162b2087358] version change: 3.5.0-28.48~bjf+lp1167114+02
git bisect good 955062c7a1fbf79550f70085ee38c162b2087358

Revision history for this message
xtsbdu3reyrbrmroezob (xtsbdu3reyrbrmroezob) wrote :

Hey <email address hidden> ... you broke our shit

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Barry Fishman
<email address hidden> wrote:
> The Debian bug #704933:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704933
> might be the same bug. It has a fix.
>
> It is caused by the "fbcon locking fixes" patch.
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2013-January/033976.html
>
>
> ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #704933
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704933
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
> duplicate bug report (1163512).
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167114
>
> Title:
> Ubuntu Kernel 3.5.0-27 does not boot
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1167114/+subscriptions

--
Kristian Erik Hermansen
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kristianhermansen
https://profiles.google.com/kristian.hermansen

Revision history for this message
Barry Fishman (barry-fishman) wrote :

The bisect kernel 3.5.0-28-generic_3.5.0-28.48~bjf+lp1167114+03_amd64 works fine for me.

Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote :

hmmm, that last bisect i did doesn't look quite right. Sorry about that, I think I need to redo that one.

Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote :

The next set of bisect kernels can be found at:

http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~bradf/lp1167114/04/

git bisect log | tee ../bisect.log
# bad: [952b77ad6885b9db4837853a88f5c931dee553d6] UBUNTU: Ubuntu-3.5.0-27.43
# good: [7c088a33fdd4ac05ec70bd1031e3e932d0dee883] UBUNTU: Ubuntu-3.5.0-26.42
git bisect start 'Ubuntu-3.5.0-27.43' 'Ubuntu-3.5.0-26.42'
# good: [5528a50f5164e8807647aae932c8261733ea868d] ext4: check bh in ext4_read_block_bitmap()
git bisect good 5528a50f5164e8807647aae932c8261733ea868d
# bad: [310871eacb882ad9252da3080dbf45bf8988ff8c] sparc64: Fix gfp_flags setting in tsb_grow().
git bisect bad 310871eacb882ad9252da3080dbf45bf8988ff8c
# bad: [3eafbd7e92c8e6401cbc476dff2a019bc0536b70] drm: don't add inferred modes for monitors that don't support them
git bisect bad 3eafbd7e92c8e6401cbc476dff2a019bc0536b70

Revision history for this message
xtsbdu3reyrbrmroezob (xtsbdu3reyrbrmroezob) wrote :

Brad...you better not be placing rootkits on our boxes with these untested
builds ;)
On Apr 22, 2013 8:01 PM, "Brad Figg" <email address hidden> wrote:

> hmmm, that last bisect i did doesn't look quite right. Sorry about
> that, I think I need to redo that one.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
> duplicate bug report (1163512).
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167114
>
> Title:
> Ubuntu Kernel 3.5.0-27 does not boot
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1167114/+subscriptions
>

Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote :

Krirstian,

Is that a good or bad kernel?

Revision history for this message
xtsbdu3reyrbrmroezob (xtsbdu3reyrbrmroezob) wrote :

All the kernels failed for me.
On Apr 22, 2013 9:01 PM, "Brad Figg" <email address hidden> wrote:

> Krirstian,
>
> Is that a good or bad kernel?
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
> duplicate bug report (1163512).
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167114
>
> Title:
> Ubuntu Kernel 3.5.0-27 does not boot
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1167114/+subscriptions
>

Revision history for this message
Petr Gladkikh (petrglad) wrote :

to #104
kernel from ~bradf/lp1167114/04/

linux-image-3.5.0-28-generic_3.5.0-28.48~bjf+lp1167114+04_amd64.deb boots OK but I get blank screen after resume and this version have many other problems.

Revision history for this message
Petr Gladkikh (petrglad) wrote :

to #104

kernel from ~bradf/lp1167114/04/
linux-image-3.5.0-28-generic_3.5.0-28.48~bjf+lp1167114+03_amd64.deb boots OK and have same issues as lp1167114+04 one

Revision history for this message
Oliver Breuer (oliver-breuer) wrote :

Just to confirm the test results on another machine:

linux-image-3.5.0-27-generic_3.5.0-27.43~spcbisect01_amd64.deb GOOD
linux-image-3.5.0-27-generic_3.5.0-27.43~spcbisect02_amd64.deb BAD
linux-image-3.2.0-41-generic_3.2.0-41.65~spcreverted30ae292_amd64.deb NOT TESTED
linux-image-3.5.0-28-generic_3.5.0-28.48~bjf+lp1167114+01_amd64.deb BAD
linux-image-3.5.0-28-generic_3.5.0-28.48~bjf+lp1167114+02_amd64.deb GOOD
linux-image-3.5.0-28-generic_3.5.0-28.48~bjf+lp1167114+03_amd64.deb NOT TESTED
linux-image-3.5.0-28-generic_3.5.0-28.48~bjf+lp1167114+04_amd64.deb GOOD

I just checked whether the kernels boot. I didn't check for other problems (like those Petr Gladkikh mentioned).

Revision history for this message
Barry Fishman (barry-fishman) wrote :

The 3.5.0-28-generic_3.5.0-28.48~bjf+lp1167114+04_amd64 booted fine for me.

Re comment #108: I have just been testing for proper booting in multiple trys, including from a cold restart. To pass all the boots must work. Since these are test kernels I am only looking for the bug in question, assuming the other patches in the sequence may break and later fix other problems.

The bisecting process assumes there is a particular patch where preceeding kernels don't have the bug and subsequent kernels do. Although this may not always be true, it does help identify when in a sequence of patches the bug is introduced, short of trying each patch in the sequence sequentionally.

Revision history for this message
Nathaniel A. Johnson (gruyere-emmentaler) wrote :

Per #107
linux-image-3.5.0-28-generic_3.5.0-28.48~bjf+lp1167114+04_amd64.deb
linux-headers-3.5.0-28_3.5.0-28.48~bjf+lp1167114+04_all.deb
linux-image-extra-3.5.0-28-generic_3.5.0-28.48~bjf+lp1167114+04_amd64.deb

Seem to be GOOD. I will continue to run them today and see if I have any problems like Petr

I did need install to use the header_all rather than
linux-headers-3.5.0-28-generic_3.5.0-28.48~bjf+lp1167114+04_amd64.deb
because of dependency issues as determined by the software center.
One other note: I am running update-grub2 after each install just to be certain.

Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote :

The next set of bisect kernels can be found at:

http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~bradf/lp1167114/05/

git bisect log | tee ../bisect.log
# bad: [952b77ad6885b9db4837853a88f5c931dee553d6] UBUNTU: Ubuntu-3.5.0-27.43
# good: [7c088a33fdd4ac05ec70bd1031e3e932d0dee883] UBUNTU: Ubuntu-3.5.0-26.42
git bisect start 'Ubuntu-3.5.0-27.43' 'Ubuntu-3.5.0-26.42'
# good: [5528a50f5164e8807647aae932c8261733ea868d] ext4: check bh in ext4_read_block_bitmap()
git bisect good 5528a50f5164e8807647aae932c8261733ea868d
# bad: [310871eacb882ad9252da3080dbf45bf8988ff8c] sparc64: Fix gfp_flags setting in tsb_grow().
git bisect bad 310871eacb882ad9252da3080dbf45bf8988ff8c
# bad: [3eafbd7e92c8e6401cbc476dff2a019bc0536b70] drm: don't add inferred modes for monitors that don't support them
git bisect bad 3eafbd7e92c8e6401cbc476dff2a019bc0536b70
# good: [50155a2e1d275f9db82586aafb56d63fcff44e97] drm/usb: bind driver to correct device
git bisect good 50155a2e1d275f9db82586aafb56d63fcff44e97

Revision history for this message
Petr Gladkikh (petrglad) wrote :

to #111

I do understand that this bisection looks for particular issue but it is hard for me to write GOOD next to that version without any caveat :)

Nonetheless issue with blank screen after waking from suspend seem relevant.

Revision history for this message
Nathaniel A. Johnson (gruyere-emmentaler) wrote :
Download full text (3.4 KiB)

I have let this kernel suspend and have manually suspended it and it seems
to behave normally. I have noticed only one place where the graphics seem
a bit hinky but nothing I can duplicate. At this point all
other behavior seems normal.

On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Petr Gladkikh
<email address hidden>wrote:

> to #111
>
> I do understand that this bisection looks for particular issue but it is
> hard for me to write GOOD next to that version without any caveat :)
>
> Nonetheless issue with blank screen after waking from suspend seem
> relevant.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167114
>
> Title:
> Ubuntu Kernel 3.5.0-27 does not boot
>
> Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu:
> Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> After upgrading to linux 3.5.0.27.43 my notebook does not boot.
> Loading recovery version of same linux kernel stops somewhere in the
> middle and does not even show a console.
>
> Previous version of linux 3.5.0.26 works just fine.
>
> NOTE the linux version reported with apport (3.5.0.26) is last working
> one not the subject of this bug.
>
> ProblemType: Bug
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
> Package: linux-image-3.5.0-26-generic 3.5.0-26.42
> ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-26.42-generic 3.5.7.6
> Uname: Linux 3.5.0-26-generic i686
> ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu10
> Architecture: i386
> AudioDevicesInUse:
> USER PID ACCESS COMMAND
> /dev/snd/controlC0: petr 2307 F.... pulseaudio
> Date: Wed Apr 10 09:52:11 2013
> EcryptfsInUse: Yes
> HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=c52d3970-fdbe-4b9a-9705-334803af7f5d
> InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-01-12 (87 days ago)
> InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 "Quantal Quetzal" - Release i386
> (20121017.2)
> MachineType: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. B53S
> MarkForUpload: True
> ProcEnviron:
> TERM=xterm
> PATH=(custom, no user)
> LANG=en_US.UTF-8
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> ProcFB:
> 0 radeondrmfb
> 1 inteldrmfb
> ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.5.0-26-generic
> root=/dev/mapper/ubuntu-root ro quiet splash
> PulseList:
> Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: Home
> directory /home/petr not ours.
> No PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon.
> RelatedPackageVersions:
> linux-restricted-modules-3.5.0-26-generic N/A
> linux-backports-modules-3.5.0-26-generic N/A
> linux-firmware 1.95
> SourcePackage: linux
> StagingDrivers: rts5139
> UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
> dmi.bios.date: 11/15/2011
> dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
> dmi.bios.version: 213
> dmi.board.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567
> dmi.board.name: B53S
> dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
> dmi.board.version: 1.0
> dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
> dmi.chassis.type: 9
> dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
> dmi.chassis.version: 1.0
> dmi.modalias:
> dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr213:bd11/15/2011:svnASUSTeKComputerInc.:pnB53S:pvr1.0:rvnASUSTeKComputerInc.:rnB53S:rvr1.0:cvnASUSTeKComp...

Read more...

Revision history for this message
Barry Fishman (barry-fishman) wrote :

The kernel 3.5.0-28-generic_3.5.0-28.48~bjf+lp1167114+05_amd64 FAILED to boot with the symptoms associated with this bug.

Revision history for this message
Oliver Breuer (oliver-breuer) wrote :

It's the same on my machine:

linux-image-3.5.0-28-generic_3.5.0-28.48~bjf+lp1167114+05_amd64.deb BAD

Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote :

The next set of bisect kernels can be found at:

http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~bradf/lp1167114/06/

git bisect log | tee ../bisect.log
# bad: [952b77ad6885b9db4837853a88f5c931dee553d6] UBUNTU: Ubuntu-3.5.0-27.43
# good: [7c088a33fdd4ac05ec70bd1031e3e932d0dee883] UBUNTU: Ubuntu-3.5.0-26.42
git bisect start 'Ubuntu-3.5.0-27.43' 'Ubuntu-3.5.0-26.42'
# good: [5528a50f5164e8807647aae932c8261733ea868d] ext4: check bh in ext4_read_block_bitmap()
git bisect good 5528a50f5164e8807647aae932c8261733ea868d
# bad: [310871eacb882ad9252da3080dbf45bf8988ff8c] sparc64: Fix gfp_flags setting in tsb_grow().
git bisect bad 310871eacb882ad9252da3080dbf45bf8988ff8c
# bad: [3eafbd7e92c8e6401cbc476dff2a019bc0536b70] drm: don't add inferred modes for monitors that don't support them
git bisect bad 3eafbd7e92c8e6401cbc476dff2a019bc0536b70
# good: [50155a2e1d275f9db82586aafb56d63fcff44e97] drm/usb: bind driver to correct device
git bisect good 50155a2e1d275f9db82586aafb56d63fcff44e97
# bad: [a4808f00a33a1b5139f845dc2673a592f942c71d] Revert "drm: Add EDID_QUIRK_FORCE_REDUCED_BLANKING for ASUS VW222S"
git bisect bad a4808f00a33a1b5139f845dc2673a592f942c71d

Changed in linux (Ubuntu):
assignee: Steve Conklin (sconklin) → Brad Figg (brad-figg)
Revision history for this message
Oliver Breuer (oliver-breuer) wrote :

linux-image-3.5.0-28-generic_3.5.0-28.48~bjf+lp1167114+06_amd64.deb GOOD

Revision history for this message
Barry Fishman (barry-fishman) wrote :

GOOD: The 3.5.0-28-generic_3.5.0-28.48~bjf+lp1167114+06 kernel boots fine.

Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote :

The next set of bisect kernels can be found at:

http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~bradf/lp1167114/07/

git bisect log | tee ../bisect.log
# bad: [952b77ad6885b9db4837853a88f5c931dee553d6] UBUNTU: Ubuntu-3.5.0-27.43
# good: [7c088a33fdd4ac05ec70bd1031e3e932d0dee883] UBUNTU: Ubuntu-3.5.0-26.42
git bisect start 'Ubuntu-3.5.0-27.43' 'Ubuntu-3.5.0-26.42'
# good: [5528a50f5164e8807647aae932c8261733ea868d] ext4: check bh in ext4_read_block_bitmap()
git bisect good 5528a50f5164e8807647aae932c8261733ea868d
# bad: [310871eacb882ad9252da3080dbf45bf8988ff8c] sparc64: Fix gfp_flags setting in tsb_grow().
git bisect bad 310871eacb882ad9252da3080dbf45bf8988ff8c
# bad: [3eafbd7e92c8e6401cbc476dff2a019bc0536b70] drm: don't add inferred modes for monitors that don't support them
git bisect bad 3eafbd7e92c8e6401cbc476dff2a019bc0536b70
# good: [50155a2e1d275f9db82586aafb56d63fcff44e97] drm/usb: bind driver to correct device
git bisect good 50155a2e1d275f9db82586aafb56d63fcff44e97
# bad: [a4808f00a33a1b5139f845dc2673a592f942c71d] Revert "drm: Add EDID_QUIRK_FORCE_REDUCED_BLANKING for ASUS VW222S"
git bisect bad a4808f00a33a1b5139f845dc2673a592f942c71d
# good: [9d12d27c0d3623e9fc149ef1f428279826a5135d] drm/udl: disable fb_defio by default
git bisect good 9d12d27c0d3623e9fc149ef1f428279826a5135d

Revision history for this message
Oliver Breuer (oliver-breuer) wrote :

linux-image-3.5.0-28-generic_3.5.0-28.48~bjf+lp1167114+07_amd64.deb BAD

Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote :

We've identified a possible upstream fix for this issue. Please test the kernels at:

http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~bradf/lp1167114/upstream-01/

Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Oliver Breuer (oliver-breuer) wrote :

linux-image-3.5.0-28-generic_3.5.0-28.48~bjf+upstream+01_amd64.deb GOOD

Revision history for this message
Barry Fishman (barry-fishman) wrote :

FAIL: The 3.5.0-28-generic_3.5.0-28.48~bjf+lp1167114+07 does not boot in the usual way.
SUCCESS: The 3.5.0-28-generic_3.5.0-28.48~bjf+upstream+01_amd64 boots fine.

Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote :

The upstream commit has been submitted to the Ubuntu kernel team mailing list. I expect to be spinning a new kernel for -proposed real soon now.

Revision history for this message
Nathaniel A. Johnson (gruyere-emmentaler) wrote :

I am posting this for anyone testing kernels that has as weak an understanding of Linux as I do :-)

The next to last set of kernels did not show up in my Software Center so I ran the following commands in the terminal.

sudo dpkg --get-selections | grep linux

That showed me a list of stuff installed with linux in its name which means the kernels I have been installing

Then I ran

sudo dpkg -r linux-image-extra-3.5.0-28-generic
sudo dpkg -r linux-image-extra-3.5.0-28-generic
sudo dpkg -r linux-image-3.5.0-28-generic

Since those are the kernel packages I installed. And now on to the last set posted. If I forgot anything feel free to comment.

Brad Figg (brad-figg)
Changed in linux (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
xtsbdu3reyrbrmroezob (xtsbdu3reyrbrmroezob) wrote :

Brad -- will this fix be in the final release of 13.04?

On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Brad Figg <email address hidden> wrote:
> ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
> Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
> duplicate bug report (1163512).
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167114
>
> Title:
> Ubuntu Kernel 3.5.0-27 does not boot
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1167114/+subscriptions

--
Kristian Erik Hermansen
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kristianhermansen
https://profiles.google.com/kristian.hermansen

Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote :

Kristian,

Yes it is already in Rarning (13.04)

Revision history for this message
Nathaniel A. Johnson (gruyere-emmentaler) wrote :

linux-image-3.5.0-28-generic_3.5.0-28.48~bjf+upstream+01_amd64.deb

Behaves like an earlier patch attempt - Lo res graphics, no peripherals.

Revision history for this message
Nathaniel A. Johnson (gruyere-emmentaler) wrote :

Which is to say
linux-image-3.5.0-28-generic_3.5.0-28.48~bjf+upstream+01_amd64.deb BAD

Revision history for this message
arsen stasic (arsen) wrote :

Bard,

could you explain what the regression was? I am just curios.

Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote :
Revision history for this message
celso (celsohenriques20-hotmail) wrote :

Wow! Congratulations! Thanks for the patience to fix this!
Its really important to us!
Thank you for all the hard work, Steve Conklin, Brad Figg and all the testers!

Regards

Revision history for this message
Christopher (soft-kristal) wrote :

Thanks - I did the official updates to -28 just now and ir booted without any issues.

Emachines running i386 3.5.0.28.

Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote :

Christopher,

You installed from -proposed?

Revision history for this message
Christopher (soft-kristal) wrote :

Yes. I have 'stable' partitions and 'proposed' ones.

Revision history for this message
Nathaniel A. Johnson (gruyere-emmentaler) wrote :

I am willing to test the proposed if you will provide a link.

Revision history for this message
Christopher (soft-kristal) wrote :

You need to change your sources in Software Updates to select the proposed versions. Most of the time they work well.

Revision history for this message
celso (celsohenriques20-hotmail) wrote :

Do you know when it will be in the normal version of the updates? (the others instead of proposed).
If you can tell me that please.
Regards

Brad Figg (brad-figg)
tags: added: verification-done-quantal
Revision history for this message
Gregory Kramida (algomorph) wrote :

@Brad, a big thanks to you and to all of the devs & testers out there.

 3.5.0.28.44 | quantal-proposed | amd64 is working for me perfectly, on the machine with the AMD Radeon HD4550 & the Intel built-in GPU.

Would you say it's safe to try and upgrade to Raring now, or is the fix still in the works there?

Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote :

Raring has had this fix for a little while. Sometimes it takes time for commits to trickle down to "stable" kernels.

Revision history for this message
xtsbdu3reyrbrmroezob (xtsbdu3reyrbrmroezob) wrote :

Thanks brad!!!
On Apr 25, 2013 6:31 AM, "Brad Figg" <email address hidden> wrote:

> Raring has had this fix for a little while. Sometimes it takes time for
> commits to trickle down to "stable" kernels.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
> duplicate bug report (1163512).
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167114
>
> Title:
> Ubuntu Kernel 3.5.0-27 does not boot
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1167114/+subscriptions
>

Revision history for this message
arsen stasic (arsen) wrote :

@Nathaniel

proposed is only for advanced users:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed

OR

cd /etc/apt/sources.list.d/
sudo echo -n 'deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ ' > proposed.list
sudo echo -n 'quantal-proposed main restricted ' >> proposed.list
sudo echo 'universe multiverse' >> proposed.list

sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install linux-headers-3.5.0-28 linux-headers-3.5.0-28-generic linux-image-3.5.0-28-generic linux-image-extra-3.5.0-28-generic
sudo rm /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ubuntu-proposed.list

Last command is to remove proposed repo.

Revision history for this message
xtsbdu3reyrbrmroezob (xtsbdu3reyrbrmroezob) wrote :

FYI. Upgrade from 12.10 to 13.04 caused my system tmp directory to become
read only and then the upgrade failed and the kernel panic ensued. More bad
mojo. Be warned. I'm about to switch to Mac after being a loyal linux user
for the last decade. Linux sucks...
On Apr 26, 2013 1:21 AM, "arsen stasic" <email address hidden> wrote:

> @Nathaniel
>
> proposed is only for advanced users:
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed
>
> OR
>
> cd /etc/apt/sources.list.d/
> sudo echo -n 'deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ ' > proposed.list
> sudo echo -n 'quantal-proposed main restricted ' >> proposed.list
> sudo echo 'universe multiverse' >> proposed.list
>
> sudo apt-get update
> sudo apt-get install linux-headers-3.5.0-28 linux-headers-3.5.0-28-generic
> linux-image-3.5.0-28-generic linux-image-extra-3.5.0-28-generic
> sudo rm /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ubuntu-proposed.list
>
> Last command is to remove proposed repo.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
> duplicate bug report (1163512).
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167114
>
> Title:
> Ubuntu Kernel 3.5.0-27 does not boot
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1167114/+subscriptions
>

Revision history for this message
Celso Henriques (celsohenriques20) wrote :

@Kristian

I usually dont use to be like i am now but, man....
Why that coment? Isn't better to post a bug to find out what caused that, so others dont experience the same problem as you did instead of such non productive coment? K'mon, we all know linux isn't perfect, but only with our help it can be better! If you need help, we are here! As we were with this bug. And only FYI, for production machines, 12.04 is advised!

Revision history for this message
gggeek (giunta-gaetano) wrote :

FWIV, same problem here on a MacBookPro 8.2.
Dual video cards: integrated intel and external AMD 6490M.
Booting via refind (uefi mode).
I disable on boot the AMD card and set some parameters for i915via grub config, but still kernel 3.5.0-27 halts with blank screen. Last tested good version: 3.5.0-26

Revision history for this message
Celso Henriques (celsohenriques20) wrote :

@ gggeek:

The bug got fixed but, didn't land yet on the normal updates repository. To use it, you need to enable the proposed repository. But i recomend waiting...

Revision history for this message
Adam Conrad (adconrad) wrote : Update Released

The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regresssions.

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :
Download full text (17.6 KiB)

This bug was fixed in the package linux - 3.5.0-28.48

---------------
linux (3.5.0-28.48) quantal-proposed; urgency=low

  [Brad Figg]

  * Release Tracking Bug
    - LP: #1172023

  [ Steve Conklin ]

  * Revert "drm/i915: GFX_MODE Flush TLB Invalidate Mode must be '1' for
    scanline waits"
    - LP: #1140716

  [ Upstream Kernel Changes ]

  * fbcon: fix locking harder
    - LP: #1167114

linux (3.5.0-28.47) quantal-proposed; urgency=low

  [Steve Conklin]

  * Release Tracking Bug
    - LP: #1166876

  [ Adam Lee ]

  * SAUCE: Bluetooth: Add support for 105b:e065
    - LP: #1161261

  [ John Johansen ]

  * SAUCE: (no-up) apparmor: Fix quieting of audit messages for network
    mediation
    - LP: #1163259

  [ Upstream Kernel Changes ]

  * NFSv4: Fix the string length returned by the idmapper
    - LP: #1101292
  * Input: cypress_ps2 - fix trackpadi found in Dell XPS12
    - LP: #1103594
  * omap_vout: find_vma() needs ->mmap_sem held
    - LP: #1164714
  * nfsd: Fix memleak
    - LP: #1164714
  * iommu/amd: Initialize device table after dma_ops
    - LP: #1164714
  * svcrpc: make svc_age_temp_xprts enqueue under sv_lock
    - LP: #1164714
  * target: Add missing mapped_lun bounds checking during make_mappedlun
    setup
    - LP: #1164714
  * xen-blkback: do not leak mode property
    - LP: #1164714
  * btrfs: Init io_lock after cloning btrfs device struct
    - LP: #1164714
  * NFS: Don't allow NFS silly-renamed files to be deleted, no signal
    - LP: #1164714
  * SUNRPC: Don't start the retransmission timer when out of socket space
    - LP: #1164714
  * storvsc: Initialize the sglist
    - LP: #1164714
  * dc395x: uninitialized variable in device_alloc()
    - LP: #1164714
  * ALSA: bt87x: Make load_all parameter working again
    - LP: #1164714
  * ARM: VFP: fix emulation of second VFP instruction
    - LP: #1164714
  * ARM: fix scheduling while atomic warning in alignment handling code
    - LP: #1164714
  * doc, xen: Mention 'earlyprintk=xen' in the documentation.
    - LP: #1164714
  * doc, kernel-parameters: Document 'console=hvc<n>'
    - LP: #1164714
  * sony-laptop: fully enable SNY controlled modems
    - LP: #1164714
  * x86: Make sure we can boot in the case the BDA contains pure garbage
    - LP: #1164714
  * cifs: ensure that cifs_get_root() only traverses directories
    - LP: #1164714
  * iscsi-target: Fix immediate queue starvation regression with DATAIN
    - LP: #1164714
  * ocfs2: fix ocfs2_init_security_and_acl() to initialize acl correctly
    - LP: #1164714
  * ocfs2: ac->ac_allow_chain_relink=0 won't disable group relink
    - LP: #1164714
  * block: fix ext_devt_idr handling
    - LP: #1164714
  * idr: fix a subtle bug in idr_get_next()
    - LP: #1164714
  * block: fix synchronization and limit check in blk_alloc_devt()
    - LP: #1164714
  * firewire: add minor number range check to fw_device_init()
    - LP: #1164714
  * idr: fix top layer handling
    - LP: #1164714
  * sysctl: fix null checking in bin_dn_node_address()
    - LP: #1164714
  * nbd: fsync and kill block device on shutdown
    - LP: #1164714
  * target/pscsi: Fix page increment
    - LP: #1164714
  * xen/pat: Disable PAT using pat_enabled...

Changed in linux (Ubuntu):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Steve Conklin (sconklin) wrote :

There is a fix in the latest released kernel that has fixed this for other users. Could you please update your system and then let us know whether you still have the problem? The fix is in updates, so a regular update should catch it.

Thanks!

Revision history for this message
Nathaniel A. Johnson (gruyere-emmentaler) wrote : Re: [Bug 1167114] Re: Ubuntu Kernel 3.5.0-27 does not boot
Download full text (3.4 KiB)

This bug was fixed for me in the 13.04 release which included this fix. I
have not had problems with it since.

On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Steve Conklin <email address hidden>wrote:

> There is a fix in the latest released kernel that has fixed this for
> other users. Could you please update your system and then let us know
> whether you still have the problem? The fix is in updates, so a regular
> update should catch it.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167114
>
> Title:
> Ubuntu Kernel 3.5.0-27 does not boot
>
> Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu:
> Fix Released
>
> Bug description:
> SRU Justification
>
> Impact:
>
> After upgrading to linux 3.5.0.27.43 my notebook does not boot.
> Loading recovery version of same linux kernel stops somewhere in the
> middle and does not even show a console.
>
> Previous version of linux 3.5.0.26 works just fine.
>
> Testing:
>
> Boot a kernel with the relevant patch applied and you should get to a
> login screen/prompt.
>
>
> NOTE the linux version reported with apport (3.5.0.26) is last working
> one not the subject of this bug.
>
> ProblemType: Bug
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
> Package: linux-image-3.5.0-26-generic 3.5.0-26.42
> ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-26.42-generic 3.5.7.6
> Uname: Linux 3.5.0-26-generic i686
> ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu10
> Architecture: i386
> AudioDevicesInUse:
> USER PID ACCESS COMMAND
> /dev/snd/controlC0: petr 2307 F.... pulseaudio
> Date: Wed Apr 10 09:52:11 2013
> EcryptfsInUse: Yes
> HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=c52d3970-fdbe-4b9a-9705-334803af7f5d
> InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-01-12 (87 days ago)
> InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 "Quantal Quetzal" - Release i386
> (20121017.2)
> MachineType: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. B53S
> MarkForUpload: True
> ProcEnviron:
> TERM=xterm
> PATH=(custom, no user)
> LANG=en_US.UTF-8
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> ProcFB:
> 0 radeondrmfb
> 1 inteldrmfb
> ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.5.0-26-generic
> root=/dev/mapper/ubuntu-root ro quiet splash
> PulseList:
> Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: Home
> directory /home/petr not ours.
> No PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon.
> RelatedPackageVersions:
> linux-restricted-modules-3.5.0-26-generic N/A
> linux-backports-modules-3.5.0-26-generic N/A
> linux-firmware 1.95
> SourcePackage: linux
> StagingDrivers: rts5139
> UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
> dmi.bios.date: 11/15/2011
> dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
> dmi.bios.version: 213
> dmi.board.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567
> dmi.board.name: B53S
> dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
> dmi.board.version: 1.0
> dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
> dmi.chassis.type: 9
> dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
> dmi.chassis.version: 1.0
> dmi.modalias:
> dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr213:bd11/15/2011:svnASUSTeKComputerInc.:pnB53S:pvr1.0:rvnASU...

Read more...

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.